2010/10/27 Radek Polak <pson...@seznam.cz>: > I also think 2.6.34 is very usable. If there is problem it's very rare. Andy- > tracking was probably more stable, but also it's ugly mess without future from > my POV.
Well, "stable" as in "there were only five more rc releases and six stable releases released to 2.6.29 after the andy-tracking branched off at 2.6.29rc3". Openmoko wise yes some parts have seen more testing, but it wouldn't be surprising if people have been hitting various issues simply because the andy-tracking was really an early development snapshot of 2.6.29 kernel. Anyway, 2.6.34 is so much nearer to upstream (ca. 75 commits on top of Torvalds' final commit) and actually based on a released kernel - it's great to see that people are now more or less happily using it already at this point! -Timo
