On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 07:23:27PM -0700, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote: > Not quite. I had for example a 5 liner rejected by a maintainer saying he > can't > accept any code which adds new platform code to ARM.
That *should* have been for 2.6.40 only, and until device tree is actually usable there's a pretty strong case for challenging such pushback. > And since the plan was to switch device tree anyway at sometime, since it > should allow to implement some of the hacks which are currently in the om tree > in a more nicer way, now should be a good time to switch. Right, but the core infrastructure for device tree is only just going in now and there's still quite a bit of work to do to get it to the point where it's usable on systems.
