-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, Ref http://issues.opennms.org/browse/NMS-4244, I have found something interesting: Thresholding is attempted even if the data collection cycle failed. Any missing values will not be thresholded, except for counter values, which it'll try to do anyway based on the last value, hence the bug report.
My question: Can anyone see a reason why moving thresholding to only occur if the collection succeeded (see CollectableService.doCollection())? My concern is that we might currently have situations where the data collection partly succeeds (e.g. some OIDs are returned but not others). Currently thresholding will work for the values are have managed to be collected; changing this as suggested means it'll never threshold in the presence of any error on that collection cycle (per node/collector). Before I spend a few days in the bowels of the collectors, does anyone know if I'm worried about something that can even happen (partial collection result sets)? Ta, - -- Craig Miskell Senior Systems Administrator Opus International Consultants Phone: +64 4 471 7209 73 is the Chuck Norris of Numbers -Leonard, on The Big Bang Theory -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk23NNAACgkQmDveRtxWqnZSQQCghqa/wKZFOJeKv1q5XJLC1z/m focAn3iC/mhMqNSaHTDS14s7rcS1UcWQ =MOEi -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ WhatsUp Gold - Download Free Network Management Software The most intuitive, comprehensive, and cost-effective network management toolset available today. Delivers lowest initial acquisition cost and overall TCO of any competing solution. http://p.sf.net/sfu/whatsupgold-sd _______________________________________________ Please read the OpenNMS Mailing List FAQ: http://www.opennms.org/index.php/Mailing_List_FAQ opennms-devel mailing list To *unsubscribe* or change your subscription options, see the bottom of this page: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opennms-devel