On 01.02.2014 08:00, Paul Fertser wrote: > On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 10:50:05PM +0100, Michael Schwingen wrote: >> I don't think this would be a good idea. Even with IPv6 gaining >> popularity, I see IPv4 in LAN installations for a long time. > It's really hard to find a PC that's not dual stack nowadays, even > with wxp. All my XP machines are IPv4 only - there simply was no need for IPv6 yet. I'm not using OpenOCD on XP, just talking about usage scenarios.
>> And no, I don't consider WinXP obsolete - it has still a lot of live >> left for lab machines used for programming/debugging hardware (not for >> web browsing obviously), so dropping support for these might be bad. > I'm not talking about dropping support. I'm talking about switching > from IPv4-only to IPv6-only. The OpenOCD daemon will still be > accessible both via localhost and from LAN even without any specific > configuration (with link-local addresses). But it will not be accessible on a IPv4 LAN. OK, installing IPv6 support on XP would solve that - maybe this is the way to go if it saves us maintenance and code duplication. cu Michael ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ WatchGuard Dimension instantly turns raw network data into actionable security intelligence. It gives you real-time visual feedback on key security issues and trends. Skip the complicated setup - simply import a virtual appliance and go from zero to informed in seconds. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=123612991&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ OpenOCD-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openocd-devel
