On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 08:07:16AM +0200, Freddie Chopin wrote: > > If not, then probably it is better to remove libusb0.dll from the > > OpenOCD Windows binary. > > The library is still required for compilation of some adapters (don't > know exactly which...), but the .dll is no longer required to be > available for the executable.
I've just seen a coworker testing amd64 version of your binary on w7, and it was refusing to start without libusb0.dll while i386 worked. -- Be free, use free (http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html) software! mailto:[email protected] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Put Bad Developers to Shame Dominate Development with Jenkins Continuous Integration Continuously Automate Build, Test & Deployment Start a new project now. Try Jenkins in the cloud. http://p.sf.net/sfu/13600_Cloudbees_APR _______________________________________________ OpenOCD-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openocd-devel
