Sorry, I see that J. Neuschäfer has already done this. I will abandon my patch - sorry, I am on holidays and my brain is not quite working so well ;)
Thanks, Jeremy On Sun, 31 Mar 2024 at 15:06, Jeremy Herbert <jeremy....@gmail.com> wrote: > Also, there appears to be an unrelated issue with the docs around the > remote bitbang protocol: > https://review.openocd.org/gitweb?p=openocd.git;f=doc/manual/jtag/drivers/remote_bitbang.txt;hb=a35e254c5383008cdacf7838a777f7f17af5eeb1#l48 > > It says "The eight mandatory functions are encoded in ASCII by assigning a > single character to each possible request." and then proceeds to list a lot > more than 8 commands. Are they all mandatory (is blink really mandatory)? > At least the "eight" should probably be updated to whatever number is > actually mandatory. > > Thanks, > Jeremy > > On Sun, 31 Mar 2024 at 14:56, Jeremy Herbert <jeremy....@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi Tommy (and all), >> >> My apologies, this fell off my radar. I have just pushed a fix now: >> https://review.openocd.org/c/openocd/+/8195 >> >> Thanks, >> Jeremy >> >> On Sat, 30 Mar 2024 at 22:27, Tommy Murphy <tommy_mur...@hotmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Just to clarify - I can't see any relevant patch here that addresses the >>> 'd' packet duplication/clash: >>> >>> * https://review.openocd.org/q/bitbang+sleep >>> >>> I can see the patch that introduced the problem though: >>> >>> * https://review.openocd.org/c/openocd/+/7472 >>> >>
