On Tue, 2009-04-21 at 17:06 +0200, Uwe Hermann wrote: > On Fri, Apr 03, 2009 at 07:52:05PM +0200, Uwe Hermann wrote: > > Unless I'm mistaken, recent OpenOCD versions will automatically > > work with both "A" and non-"A" variants of the ft2232_device_desc > > variables. For example, > > ft2232_device_desc "Amontec JTAGkey" > > and > > ft2232_device_desc "Amontec JTAGkey A" > > should both work fine, on Windows as well as on Mac OS X and Linux, > > correct? If that is the case, let's drop all non-A variants, see patch. > > > > Also: Let JTAGkey-tiny include JTAGkey, as they're the same. > > *ping* > > Can somebody please review this patch? I think we can safely drop the > non-"A" variants now, but it would be good if someone could confirm that.
Since no one has responded yet, I think it would be safe to apply this. The expectation will be that anyone that finds a problem will promptly report it, and the patch can be reverted. I think the past 24 hours demonstrates that this is a _very_ effective means of getting feedback. Further, this and earlier postings moot all future claims regarding insufficient notice. Cheers, Zach _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
