On May 7, 2009, at 1:30 PM, Zach Welch wrote:
On Thu, 2009-05-07 at 21:27 +0200, Michael Fischer wrote:Hello List, the problem with r1621 can be solved if AC_PROG_CC_C99 is removed from configure.in. In this cas we have r1620. But this is not solving the problem in the last version r1649 if I remove AC_PROG_CC_C99 here too.Can you provide more details about the C99 breakage? You are the firstperson to report a problem, so I figure there is a workaround Darwin. Cheers Zach _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
I saw no C99 breakage with r1649 but I didn't build all the possible interfaces. I did see that gcc was being invoked in gnu99 mode.
-- Rick Altherr kc8...@kc8apf.net"He said he hadn't had a byte in three days. I had a short, so I split it with him."
-- Unsigned
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
