If one looks at his commits, he checked in a lot of BROKEN STUFF. Nice
meritocracy there!
So impartiality is only when it suits you eh?
I don't have to have submitted any patch to see that there are huge and biased
flaws in this argument.
Both Oyvind and you have bigger profitable hidden agendas than everyone else in
the latest threads.
Therefore, don't be surprised if people nit pick on your lame attitudes towards
some things and not so on others.
It has to be the same standards for both. Not one for you and your money
cronnies, and one for the users who actually use the stuff.
________________________________
From: Zach Welch <z...@superlucidity.net>
To: Photo Leecher <photoleec...@yahoo.co.uk>
Cc: openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
Sent: Tuesday, 23 June, 2009 23:21:05
Subject: Re: [Openocd-development] License
On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 22:02 +0000, Photo Leecher wrote:
> Isn't it great that you are against a solution that would put a dent
> in sales of your overpriced rip off 700€ hardware?
> Gotta love the impartiality here...
Screw impartiality. If this should be a meritocracy, then Øyvind has
contributed enough to the community as a whole to earn his vote.
How much have you contributed, again? How many patches is that?
> The exception could be allowed now and then removed later once the
> supposed new solutions are done and working.
With the exception, there is no motive for anyone to work on a fix.
See how much activity has come to life, once the issue became a problem?
This is a good thing for open source.
Cheers,
Zach
_______________________________________________
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
