On Tuesday 23 June 2009, Øyvind Harboe wrote: > > We all want openocd to be open - I just do not see why adding > > an exception to ftd2xx is opening any floodgates for other vendors. > > I have not seen a specific proposal for new license so I can't > really comment.
That's a good point. Likewise, we've not seen a complete list of copyright holders who would need to agree to that proposed change. > Do you want to list ftd2xx specifically when there are technical > solutions to that specific problem proposed that could be > effectuated *long* before a license change could be made? Hey, another Fine Point. ... wait. Do you mean to say that instead of flaming on this list, some folk could actually have been doing PRODUCTIVE work to solve the problem? Say it ain't so!! _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
