On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 11:15 PM, Duane Ellis<open...@duaneellis.com> wrote: > Zach Welch wrote: >> Only libusb+libftdi serves our long-term interests. >> > Wrong. > > "libusb" is a *blocking* issue that we cannot control, fix, nor > whatever. LIBUSB is not supported by *newer* windows platforms. Unless > and until it is supported it becomes a dead end solution, period, end of > story. > > I believe the "WinUSB" solution is a solution, that for some reason > keeps being left off your list. > > http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa476426.aspx >
I agree with you that WinUSB is a solution for OpenOCD. It is actually a solution for libusb-win32 as well. ;-) On the other hand, libusb-win32+libftdi may still need to be the solution for Windows 2000 users (and maybe 98SE and Win ME). -- Xiaofan http://mcuee.blogspot.com _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
