On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 7:38 PM, Dominic<dominic.r...@gmx.de> wrote: > These tests show libftdi ahead of ftd2xx or only very slightly behind. This > is by no means a complete performance evaluation and the devil might be in > the details, but I think it shows that these days libftdi is on par with > ftd2xx, at least on Linux.
http://www.nonpolynomial.com/archives/2008/04/libusb-libftdi-latency-and-my-own-stupid.php Just take note ftd2xx is based on libusb 0.1 under Linux. Whereas ftd2xx under Windows is not based on libusb-win32 0.1. > The libftdi 1.13 that comes with (K)Ubuntu 9.04 is already compiled > --with--async-mode. I don't have an older version that lacks this feature > lying around. >From the above link, it seems that moving to libusb 1.0 will further increase the performance for Linux (compared to libftdi). -- Xiaofan http://mcuee.blogspot.com _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
