On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 8:55 PM, Michael Bruck<mbr...@digenius.de> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 17:34, Zach Welch<z...@superlucidity.net> wrote: >> On Wed, 2009-06-24 at 16:00 +0200, Michael Bruck wrote: >>> >>> The libusb improvements certainly sound interesting, however no one >>> has stepped forward to implement them or to pay someone to implement >>> them. They may or may not also require some reverse engineering plus >>> extensive profiling that would make them more time-consuming than the >>> wrapper. So they don't seem like a near-term solution at the moment. >> >> Others have stated emphatically that the specifications are open and >> available for the developers to take a whack at replacing their library. >> Unless it is incomplete or inaccurate, the matter should be >> straightforward enough. :) Heh. > > I have not seen a spec that documents the USB endpoints and how to > interact with them. But if someone has a link to that it would be nice > if that person could post that. >
The libftdi code may help. One more page through Google. http://yosemitefoothills.com/Electronics/FTDI_Chip_Commands.html -- Xiaofan http://mcuee.blogspot.com _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
