> -----Original Message----- > From: openocd-development-boun...@lists.berlios.de [mailto:openocd- > development-boun...@lists.berlios.de] On Behalf Of Zach Welch > Sent: woensdag 8 juli 2009 0:35 > To: Øyvind Harboe > Cc: openocd-development@lists.berlios.de > Subject: Re: [Openocd-development] 0.2.0 release... on hold? > > On Wed, 2009-07-08 at 00:14 +0200, Øyvind Harboe wrote: > > > We need to find some balance. Right now, the presses are too heavily > > > biased toward "development" to the extent that "release" suffers badly. > > > > I definitely want to see a reset of the release timeout counter > > when we discover such problems as we have seen in > > the last week. > > > > The "step" bug alone would have made *all* the regression test > > scripts fail... I wouldn't even want to ask Michael Fischer to > > run the regression test suite without that one in place... > > Right, so I do want to make it clear that some of these are entirely > legitimate bugs that you are fixing. No dispute about that. In that > regard, I am happy to reset the release deadline while we consider the > patches. However, there does need to be a limit to the number of resets > that we allow for new issues.
If I may be very blunt: I don't think we are very close to a 0.2.0 release. It seems (based on bug reports) the recent changes broke some of the existing functionality. That needs to be tested & fixed first. IMHO release 0.2.0 should have at least the same functionality that 0.1.0 had. Nico Coesel _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
