+++ Øyvind Harboe [2009-09-01 08:39 +0200]: > 1614 introduces *lots* of changes. It could have been broken into half > a dozen commits. :-) > > One thing to try: > > tms_sequence long
That was added in r1834, so is not present in r1614 where the issue started. So presumably I'm using the old 'long' style already? Are there public xsvf specs I can look at to try and understand what valid/invalid transitions actually are? Wookey -- Principal hats: iEndian - Balloonboard - Toby Churchill - Emdebian http://wookware.org/ _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
