On Wednesday 28 October 2009, Zach Welch wrote: > I just tagged 0.3.0-rc0 and will post the packages shortly.
Great! Thanks. I don't think anyone's going to object to this milestone being "rc0" not "rc1", although it's a somewhat unusual naming convention. Could you elaborate on what you're using? And how the git tags relate to the release labels? Example, currently I see: - 0.3.0-rc0 ... label on tarballs Or from the git tree: - 0.3.0-rc1-dev ... what "info openoccd.info" reports - v0.3.0-rc0-1-gb628207 ... what "git describe" says - 0.3.0-rc1-dev-00001-gb628207-dirty ... from "openocd -v" so it's not very consistent. Tree says rc1 but that's not what the tag says... - Dave _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
