On Tue, Nov 03, 2009 at 10:13:24PM +0100, Øyvind Harboe wrote: > >> Should this fix be included for 0.3 or not? > > > > Doesn't matter to me... > > What I meant to ask is: do you think other OpenOCD > users would appreciate it if we included this fix at this > advanced stage?
I have no idea what other openocd users would appreciate. Do other users poke core registers a lot? > It's a risk/reward judgment on whether to include > bugfixes at an advanced stage in the testing cycle... > I thought you might have an opinion on that. I don't think I know enough about OpenOCD as a whole to weigh the risk vs. the reward. My experience with it has been a net total of about 20 hours. 10 back in May and 10 today and yesterday. But I do appreciate the sentiment! > Obviously you have the fix for your own purposes > and I guess you'll be working against your current > version or git master/head? Yes. My tree is at git.devl.org Also, unrelated, I still owe you hardware. Do you still have a testing rig? I haven't forgotten, I just didn't want to send you something that I wasn't sure would work. I haven't had a chance to get back to testing JTAG until now... -Mar. _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
