On Thu, 2009-11-19 at 19:47 -0700, David Brownell wrote: > Why is there even a number appended? > > Just let whoever defines the name define it however they want, > and insist only that it be unique. > > That will get rid of lots of possible errors inthe code...
Well, the code in question supports '{driver/controller}_name[.num]' style names (which I added in my original patch). Arbitrary names (such as 'foo.flash') came after I added the required member to the bank/device structures, and I thought to myself: "hey, look -- it will be easy to support both styles." It remains to be seen if I was right, or whether it's worth having both. --Z _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development