On Thursday 17 December 2009, Dean Glazeski wrote:
> +       if (ERROR_NAND_NO_BUFFER == retval) {

That's something OpenOCD doesn't do often enough:  have
fault handling logic that's specific to the fault!

Instead of, say, throwing up its hands in the face of
any/all faults, and not even trying to recover.

Or, as in a previous iteration of this patch, just
assuming all faults are the same, and can thus be
handled identically.  :)

- Dave

_______________________________________________
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development

Reply via email to