On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 5:49 PM, David Brownell <davi...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> On Thursday 28 January 2010, Edgar Grimberg wrote: > > How about we try using a bug database of sorts? Mantis is the first > > that comes to mind. It can be read-only for the general public and > > only the maintainers (and "official testers", if you like) can add > > bugs into it. It's a way to gather all the reports from the list into > > one place, attach version to bugs and follow up on them as they get > > fixed (or not). > > I would have thought trac [ http://trac.edgewall.org/ ] ... > > Using trac would involve just turning on a feature at SourceForge, > and (the problematic bit) actually using it. Using bug databases > isn't free; people need to tend and feed them, prune garbage, use > reports to help direct development efforts (i.e. cat-herding), etc. > > A few features of trac: > > - bug database > > - feature/release planning > > - wiki (which IMO we should have anyway) > > Poke at the demo page (SF has version 0.11.2.1 it seems) for info. > > - Dave > _______________________________________________ > Openocd-development mailing list > Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de > https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development > You know, I'm sort of in love with Trac. I love the way their code is designed and I love their system. I've been using for quite some time. Do you have this working with the OpenOCD git repository on SF? There is a plug-in for git support in Trac, but I've never used it. -- // Dean Glazeski
_______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
