Hello Øyvind! :-) On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 3:27 PM, Øyvind Harboe <oyvind.har...@zylin.com> wrote: > the official position of the maintainers is that we want a maintainable, > documented SWD implementation or none at all.
Good approach, totally agree on this! :-) I have just started http://sourceforge.net/projects/stm32primer2swd/ that will document my SWD works on Stm32Primer2 - I will use KT-LINK and embedded RLink, but KT-LINK has more priority as it is more generic (FT2232H based). This site can be later used as a documentation source. Is there already any scheme/design on how SWD should work in OpenOCD? Should it imitate JTAG after "swd init" at the highest level? > I know David hasn't been able to work on SWD as much as he had > planned or hoped. Well, I had some shifts and delays too, but luckily have some time for this at the moment - I also have to finish this around the end of year so my motivation is constantly increasing ;-) Best regards! Tomek -- CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
