Hi,
This patch fixes the sector layout of the 512-KiB LPC2000 parts that use the
"lpc2000_v2" variant. This affects LPC2300/2400 devices.
Older devices (LPC213x) had only 27 sectors available (500 KiB), but the
LPC2300 have 28 sectors (504 KiB).
Regards,
Rolf
From dc19097c753aa3185fe8111b440884e9a76a94a2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rolf Meeser <rolfm_...@yahoo.de>
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2010 14:06:11 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 4/5] Fix sector layout for 504-KiB LPC2000 devices
---
src/flash/nor/lpc2000.c | 11 +++++++----
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/flash/nor/lpc2000.c b/src/flash/nor/lpc2000.c
index 14d0e44..fea663e 100644
--- a/src/flash/nor/lpc2000.c
+++ b/src/flash/nor/lpc2000.c
@@ -196,10 +196,13 @@ static int lpc2000_build_sector_list(struct flash_bank *bank)
case 256 * 1024:
bank->num_sectors = 15;
break;
- case 512 * 1024:
case 500 * 1024:
bank->num_sectors = 27;
break;
+ case 512 * 1024:
+ case 504 * 1024:
+ bank->num_sectors = 28;
+ break;
default:
LOG_ERROR("BUG: unknown bank->size encountered");
exit(-1);
@@ -210,7 +213,7 @@ static int lpc2000_build_sector_list(struct flash_bank *bank)
for (i = 0; i < bank->num_sectors; i++)
{
- if ((i >= 0) && (i < 8))
+ if (i < 8)
{
bank->sectors[i].offset = offset;
bank->sectors[i].size = 4 * 1024;
@@ -218,7 +221,7 @@ static int lpc2000_build_sector_list(struct flash_bank *bank)
bank->sectors[i].is_erased = -1;
bank->sectors[i].is_protected = 1;
}
- if ((i >= 8) && (i < 22))
+ else if (i < 22)
{
bank->sectors[i].offset = offset;
bank->sectors[i].size = 32 * 1024;
@@ -226,7 +229,7 @@ static int lpc2000_build_sector_list(struct flash_bank *bank)
bank->sectors[i].is_erased = -1;
bank->sectors[i].is_protected = 1;
}
- if ((i >= 22) && (i < 27))
+ else if (i < 28)
{
bank->sectors[i].offset = offset;
bank->sectors[i].size = 4 * 1024;
--
1.7.2.3
_______________________________________________
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
