Hi Peter,
I just saw your mail after submitting a patch. I kept the double
pointer usage for consistency but simplified the logic.
On 2010/12/08 15:35, Peter Stuge wrote:
Should it? I don't think the following callback should be skipped
just because the current one is removed.
I believe you're correct, must have been getting late. My patch doesn't
advance the pointer and iterates once again with the updated value.
Regards,
Paul
_______________________________________________
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
