On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 12:23 PM, Damjan Marion <damjan.mar...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On May 23, 2011, at 11:42 AM, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
>
>>> Is there any plans to improve flash detection (i.e. detecting on 
>>> vendor,device pairs)?
>>
>> Please see if you can't write up a patch?
>>
>> Doesn't sound awfully hard to implement.
>
> Yes, I can write a patch. I think that we should change device table to 
> something like this:
>
> static struct nand_info nand_flash_ids[] =
> {
>        { NAND_MFR_SAMSUNG,     0xD5, 0, 8192, 0, LP_OPTIONS,   "K9GAG08 2GB 
> NAND 3.3V x8 (MLC 2bit/cell)"},
>        { NAND_MFR_SAMSUNG,     0xD7, 0, 8192, 0, LP_OPTIONS,   
> "K9LBG08/K9HCG08 4/8GB NAND 3.3V x8 (MLC 2bit/cell)"},
>        /* start "museum" IDs */
>        { 0x0,                  0x6e, 256, 1, 0x1000, 0,        "NAND 1MiB 5V 
> 8-bit"},
>        { 0x0,                  0x64, 256, 2, 0x1000, 0,        "NAND 2MiB 5V 
> 8-bit"},
>
> - added manufacturer field
> - description moved to the end for text alignment reasons
>
> Do we agree?

Sounds good to me.

Please split the patches into one patch where you update the table
and another patch where you actually start using the information in
the new table.




-- 
Øyvind Harboe

Can Zylin Consulting help on your project?

US toll free 1-866-980-3434 / International +47 51 87 40 27

http://www.zylin.com/zy1000.html
ARM7 ARM9 ARM11 XScale Cortex
JTAG debugger and flash programmer
_______________________________________________
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development

Reply via email to