Steve Bennett wrote:
On 21/06/2011, at 5:01 PM, Xiaofan Chen wrote:
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 2:55 PM, Xiaofan Chen <xiaof...@gmail.com> wrote:
But are you sure to have the correct libusb version. On linux and mac, the
libusb is the kernel driver for the d2xx.
This has been discussed before and I think in this case an exception should
be granted and the patch should be accepted.
Thread:
http://lists.berlios.de/pipermail/openocd-development/2011-March/018422.html
I was suggesting the user to use the open source libftdi and libftdi-1.0
under Linux instead but D2XX might still have some benefits so that
users may still want to use it.
It is a long thread but I was able to reproduce the error.
http://lists.berlios.de/pipermail/openocd-development/2011-March/018434.html
"I think the latest d2xx library needs some fix from the OpenOCD
side or from the d2xx side."
It is more difficult to ask FTDI for a fix so it may better to fix this from
OpenOCD side. Therefore I think the patch should be accepted.
When FTDI fixes D2xx, then probably the patch can be reverted.
I have reported the problem to FTDI, but in my experience we can not
expect a response soon, if ever.
I think there are two options, either apply the patch as a workaround
(note that the returned value is *never* used), or remove support for D2XX.
Thank you Steve,
If you do not get any reply on next Monday, please let me know I will
ask them. Amontec has good contacts to FTDI team.
Please apply the patch as a workaround.
But if the returned value is never used, there are no reason to give a
warning !
Laurent
http://www.amontec.com
Cheers,
Steve
--
µWeb: Embedded Web Framework - http://uweb.workware.net.au/
WorkWare Systems Pty Ltd
W: www.workware.net.au P: +61 434 921 300
E: ste...@workware.net.au F: +61 7 3391 6002
_______________________________________________
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
