On 19:15 Tue 28 Jun , Øyvind Harboe wrote: > On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 6:58 PM, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD > <plagn...@jcrosoft.com> wrote: > > On 19:04 Tue 28 Jun , Øyvind Harboe wrote: > >> > The best way to do is to choose one git tree as the master git > >> > then each maintainer will have their one git tree too > >> > where they manage it how they want. > >> > >> All the maintainers have their own repositories and forks at the git > >> mirror, but we also have write access to the master repository. > > Agreed > > > > but the only one normally applied patch or merge pull request is me > > or we must synchronise each other to avoid conflict. > > I'm not familiar with that workflow, but I've briefly read about it. > > Is that what we would want for OpenOCD at this point? yes > > I don't want to move the location of the openocd master repository. we do not need to move it
but now all the maintainer will have their own fork/repository as done in the kernel Best Regards, J. _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
