P.S. Is it just me, or the default reply address is the sender himself, and not the list?
Regards, Ákos On 9 October 2011 23:28, Akos Vandra <axo...@gmail.com> wrote: > I am using the libswd fork, but I don't know how functional it is as > of yet, because I don't have any hardware to test it. > I just joined the list not so long ago, as my thesis is about the SWO > trace output (both analyzing and configuring) so it is closely tied to > SWD. I'm thinking about using openocd to send the SWD commands, and > maybe integrating this support into openocd later, if it works out, > and you guys are interested in it. > > Regards, > Ákos Vandra > > On 9 October 2011 23:13, Andreas Fritiofson > <andreas.fritiof...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 10:43 PM, Peter Stuge <pe...@stuge.se> wrote: >>> >>> Øyvind Harboe wrote: >>> > On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 3:40 AM, Peter Stuge <pe...@stuge.se> wrote: >>> > > Transfer rate: 3 KB/sec, 13848 bytes/write. >>> > >>> > USB roundtrips? >>> >>> Ḯ'll have a look with usbmon soon. >> >> >> U+0618 LATIN CAPITAL LETTER I WITH DIRT ON TOP? I tried to scrape it off my >> monitor, dammit... :) >> It sounds like the LM3S flash algorithm could use a rewrite like the one I >> merged for STM32F10x yesterday. Flash speed went up from 9KB/s to 29 KB/s. >> I don't know why "before"-speed was so low when I tested yesterday, I >> normally got around 14 KB/s. Maybe the bus/computer was extra heavily >> loaded. I've never seen it as far down as your figures though. Almost as if >> the LM3S driver lacks block write completely. >> Examining the timestamps in the full debug log is a good complement to >> usbmon when debugging performance problems, btw. >> >>> >>> Akos Vandra wrote: >>> > (At least) in SWD mode with an FTDI programmer openocd is sending >>> > data bit by bit. I am planning to send in a patch to fix that, but >>> > I am currently unable to test it, because I am waiting for my >>> > SWD-capable programmer. >>> >>> LM3S knows JTAG and SWD. ICDI is FT2232 based and knows JTAG and SWD, >>> and it's what the late David Brownell was doing his SWD work on, but >>> my setup is using JTAG. >> >> I'm pretty sure that mainline ft2232 uses byte writes whenever possible. >> Akos: Is SWD even remotely up and running in mainline or are you using a >> fork? >> /Andreas >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Openocd-development mailing list >> Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de >> https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development >> >> > _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
