On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 12:59 AM, Peter Stuge <pe...@stuge.se> wrote: > Øyvind Harboe wrote: >> > I don't like the change so much. It ends up declaring the exact same >> > variable twice, and other odd noise, to silence a warning. Is there >> > no better way? >> >> Reusing the 'target' variable name here is bad. > .. >> The code is now more easily re-factored as multiple functions > > Ok, can we please do that then, instead of working around static > analysis?
In this case, I disagree that it is "working around static analysis". I'll see about having a peek at the code again for cleaning it up. -- Øyvind Harboe - Can Zylin Consulting help on your project? US toll free 1-866-980-3434 http://www.zylin.com/ _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
