OpenPKG CVS Repository
http://cvs.openpkg.org/
____________________________________________________________________________
Server: cvs.openpkg.org Name: Michael Schloh
Root: /e/openpkg/cvs Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Module: openpkg-src Date: 14-Dec-2004 18:55:59
Branch: HEAD Handle: 2004121417555800
Modified files:
openpkg-src/perl-apache perl-apache.spec
Log:
modifying package: perl-apache-5.8.6 20041129 -> 20041214
Summary:
Revision Changes Path
1.39 +2 -2 openpkg-src/perl-apache/perl-apache.spec
____________________________________________________________________________
patch -p0 <<'@@ .'
Index: openpkg-src/perl-apache/perl-apache.spec
============================================================================
$ cvs diff -u -r1.38 -r1.39 perl-apache.spec
--- openpkg-src/perl-apache/perl-apache.spec 29 Nov 2004 19:38:03 -0000
1.38
+++ openpkg-src/perl-apache/perl-apache.spec 14 Dec 2004 17:55:58 -0000
1.39
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@
%define V_perl 5.8.6
%define V_apache_authcookie 3.06
%define V_apache_authcookiedbi 1.19
-%define V_apache_admin_config 0.91
+%define V_apache_admin_config 0.92
%define V_apache_dbi 0.94
%define V_apache_filter 1.022
%define V_apache_htpasswd 1.5.8
@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@
Group: Language
License: GPL/Artistic
Version: %{V_perl}
-Release: 20041129
+Release: 20041214
# list of sources
Source0:
http://www.cpan.org/modules/by-module/Apache/Apache-AuthCookie-%{V_apache_authcookie}.tar.gz
@@ .
______________________________________________________________________
The OpenPKG Project www.openpkg.org
CVS Repository Commit List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From jeff Tue Dec 14 17:53:20 2004
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery-Date: Tue Dec 14 09:53:20 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Envelope-to: [email protected]
Delivery-date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 09:53:20 -0800
Received: from exprod5mx123.postini.com ([64.18.0.37] helo=psmtp.com)
by toko.jab.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1CeGrQ-0006eV-00
for <[email protected]>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 09:53:20 -0800
Received: from source ([205.217.113.11]) by exprod5mx123.postini.com
([64.18.4.10]) with SMTP;
Tue, 14 Dec 2004 12:55:50 EST
Received: from m18.lax.untd.com [64.136.30.81] by mail.bestware.biz
(SMTPD32-8.01) id A46E51F00F2; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 11:35:42 -0600
Received: from m18.lax.untd.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by m18.lax.untd.com with SMTP id AABA58J8MAXDRUH2
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (sender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>);
Tue, 14 Dec 2004 09:32:59 -0800 (PST)
X-UNTD-OriginStamp: az9YdFY2ee3SNysnJfolq1opv2ofFRscNrH4TFurDDsqV8Mg+oeMBA==
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by m18.lax.untd.com (jqueuemail) id KETY8Y4L; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 09:31:53 PST
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 10:26:52 -0700
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Is Truth always rational?
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: Juno 5.0.33
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=--__JNP_000_3e73.556e.139b
X-Juno-Line-Breaks: 7-6,7-8,10-15,17,18-32767
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-ContentStamp: 8:4:3469319125
X-MAIL-INFO:
3af46db99444ddc5b9819464c57d15d09d557dc4c5b9b984cdc5ada9ede1d964102960f5c9c059
Precedence: bulk
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-pstn-levels: (S:99.90000/99.90000 R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:94.8624 C:98.9754 )
X-pstn-settings: 1 (0.1500:0.1500) gt3 gt2 gt1 r p m c
X-pstn-addresses: from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [294/10]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on toko.jab.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HTML_FONTCOLOR_BLUE,
HTML_FONTCOLOR_RED,HTML_MESSAGE,NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.64
This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.
----__JNP_000_3e73.556e.139b
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
when's the last time you said 'Raca' or visitd Caiaphas?
"..anyone who says to his brother, 'Raca', is answerable to the
Sanhedrin."
On Tue, 14 Dec 2004 10:03:18 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
myth ('you' are dead, too)
On Tue, 14 Dec 2004 05:31:12 -0500 "Jeff Powers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
..THIS IS the point. Sorry G ..
----__JNP_000_3e73.556e.139b
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2800.1476" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bottomMargin=3D0 bgColor=3D#ffffff leftMargin=3D3 topMargin=3D0 =
rightMargin=3D3>
<DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS" color=3D#000080 size=3D2><STRONG>when's =
the last=20
time you said 'Raca' or visitd Caiaphas?</STRONG></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><STRONG><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS" color=3D#000080=20
size=3D2></FONT></STRONG> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS" color=3D#000080 size=3D2><STRONG>"<FONT=20
color=3D#ff0000>..anyone who says to his brother, 'Raca', is answerable to =
the=20
Sanhedrin</FONT>."</STRONG></FONT><BR></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>On Tue, 14 Dec 2004 10:03:18 -0700 <A=20
href=3D"mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]">[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A> writes:</DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20
style=3D"PADDING-LEFT: 10px; MARGIN-LEFT: 10px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px =
solid">
<DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS" color=3D#000080 size=3D2><STRONG>myth (=
'you' are=20
dead, too)</STRONG></FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>On Tue, 14 Dec 2004 05:31:12 -0500 "Jeff Powers" <<A=20
href=3D"mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]">[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>>=20
writes:</DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20
style=3D"PADDING-LEFT: 10px; MARGIN-LEFT: 10px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px =
solid">
<DIV><FONT face=3DGeorgia>..THIS IS the point. Sorry G=20
..</FONT></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE>
<DIV> </DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
----__JNP_000_3e73.556e.139b--
----------
"Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know
how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org
If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL
PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to
join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
From jeff Tue Dec 14 17:53:22 2004
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery-Date: Tue Dec 14 09:53:22 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Envelope-to: [email protected]
Delivery-date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 09:53:22 -0800
Received: from exprod5mx12.postini.com ([64.18.0.152] helo=psmtp.com)
by toko.jab.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1CeGrS-0006eg-00
for <[email protected]>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 09:53:22 -0800
Received: from source ([12.107.209.250]) by exprod5mx12.postini.com
([64.18.4.10]) with SMTP;
Tue, 14 Dec 2004 09:56:00 PST
Received: (qmail 26289 invoked by alias); 14 Dec 2004 17:55:57 -0000
Mailing-List: contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (qmail 26268 invoked by uid 48); 14 Dec 2004 17:55:55 -0000
Date: 14 Dec 2004 17:55:55 -0000
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Bug target/18912] FW: gcc 3.3.1 for Powerpc optimzation flag -Os
generates bad code
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-pstn-levels: (S:99.90000/99.90000 R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:94.8624 C:98.9754 )
X-pstn-settings: 1 (0.1500:0.1500) gt3 gt2 gt1 r p m c
X-pstn-addresses: from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [294/10]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on toko.jab.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
version=2.64
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-14
17:55 -------
Closing as fixed then.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
Target Milestone|--- |3.4.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18912
From jeff Tue Dec 14 17:53:28 2004
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery-Date: Tue Dec 14 09:53:28 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Envelope-to: [email protected]
Delivery-date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 09:53:28 -0800
Received: from exprod5mx126.postini.com ([64.18.0.40] helo=psmtp.com)
by toko.jab.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1CeGrY-0006fE-00
for <[email protected]>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 09:53:28 -0800
Received: from source ([64.118.64.245]) by exprod5mx126.postini.com
([64.18.4.10]) with SMTP;
Tue, 14 Dec 2004 12:56:04 EST
Received: from LOCALHOST by LOCALHOST
with ESMTP id 0ECB858BD815C140BF5F61DEBF1F0E22
Tue, 14 Dec 2004 10:57:37 -0500
Subject: Re: death for scott peterson
From: "G" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Community <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 09:55:27 -0600
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-pstn-levels: (S:50.93651/99.90000 R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:94.5022 C:98.9754 )
X-pstn-settings: 1 (0.1500:0.1500) gt3 gt2 gt1 r p m c
X-pstn-addresses: from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> forward (good recip) [294/10]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on toko.jab.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.64
Camus' Stranger?
Read it in high school, remember liking it a lot (i'm a fan of
existentialism)....but I don't remember much else about the book. I do
remember the lead character being rather apathetic at the death of a family
member...his Dad I think.
Does it have some relevance to the Peterson trial ya think???
> wow, has anyone read The Stranger?
>
> Actually, I think he is guilty and it was the taped conversations with
> Amber that did it for me. He told her he had "lost" his wife while
> Laci was still unsuspectingly getting ready for Christmas. All well
> and good and married men *have* been known to lie to their
> girlfriends. Except that a few days later, he *does* "lose" Laci.
> Also, the stuff about not wanting his own children although he was
> very willing to play and be with Amber's little girl is pretty
> damning. He was adamant about it on those tapes. I think the
> difference between Amber's little girl and Laci's little boy was that
> he would have owed child support for Conor. That's a pretty sleazy
> motive for murder.
>
> However, I find it pretty amazing that the physical evidence amounts
> to one hair. Either he's a very careful bastard, or they screwed up.
>
> Dana
>
>
>
> On Tue, 14 Dec 2004 10:20:24 -0500, Bill Wheatley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>> WOW then you get this.
>>
>> http://www.cnn.com/2004/LAW/12/14/peterson.case/index.html
>>
>> Jurors who decided that Scott Peterson deserves to die say his lack of
>> emotion played a large role in their decision.
>> Maybe he was sitting stone faced because standing up and screaming i
>> didnt do it wouldn't help him any? heh
>>
>> On Tue, 14 Dec 2004 10:53:45 -0400, Angel Stewart
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > And Vice Versa.
>> >
>> > Hmm..that's strange though don't you think?
>> > A case with this much media coverage,
>> > and we don't really know WHAT they convicted him on do we?
>> >
>> > -Gel
>> >
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: G
>> >
>> > And you didn't see 1% of what the jury saw.
>> >
>> > Your vindication of him is based on media reports, while their
>> > indicment of him is based on arduous deliberation of the facts. I
>> > simply don't see how you can be so sure that you are right, and they
>> > are wrong.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>
>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Special thanks to the CF Community Suite Silver Sponsor - RUWebby
http://www.ruwebby.com
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:139786
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5
Unsubscribe:
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
From jeff Tue Dec 14 17:53:23 2004
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery-Date: Tue Dec 14 09:53:23 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Envelope-to: [email protected]
Delivery-date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 09:53:23 -0800
Received: from exprod5mx128.postini.com ([64.18.0.42] helo=psmtp.com)
by toko.jab.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1CeGrT-0006ey-00
for <[email protected]>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 09:53:23 -0800
Received: from source ([146.82.138.6]) by exprod5mx128.postini.com
([64.18.4.10]) with SMTP;
Tue, 14 Dec 2004 09:56:03 PST
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by murphy.debian.org (Postfix) with QMQP
id 92AC42E020; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 11:55:56 -0600 (CST)
Old-Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Original-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from www.derailleur.org (pc09.hist.utoronto.ca [128.100.34.9])
by murphy.debian.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D84122DE9B
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 11:55:54 -0600
(CST)
Received: from matt by www.derailleur.org with local (Exim 4.34 #1 (Debian))
id 1CeGu3-0000rU-MC
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 12:56:03 -0500
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 12:56:03 -0500
From: Matt Price <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: debian users <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: distro for novices
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mail-Followup-To: debian users <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
X-Rc-Virus: 2004-10-30_01
X-Rc-Spam: 2004-08-29_01
Resent-Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Resent-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailing-List: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> archive/latest/372070
X-Loop: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
List-Id: <debian-user.lists.debian.org>
List-Post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Archive: <http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/>
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Resent-Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 11:55:56 -0600 (CST)
X-pstn-levels: (S:99.90000/99.90000 R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:94.8624 C:98.9754 )
X-pstn-settings: 1 (0.1500:0.0150) gt3 GT2 gt1 r p m c
X-pstn-addresses: from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [294/10]
Resent-Bcc:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on toko.jab.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
version=2.64
Hi folks,
this is not a troll, really! I'm just looking for some advice.
I've been using Debian exclusively for about 2.5 years, and it's the
only linux with which I really have any experience. I teach in the
history department at a Canadian university and have been asked to
teach a somewhat unusual coursee next semester: not history at all,
but a kind of "technical self-sufficiency" not-for-credit
community-based course in a local housing project. Students will
asssemble their own computers, install an operating system, and learn
how to use it.
The students will come from a pretty wide variety of backgrounds; many
will be refugees and refugee claimants, others are new immigrants to
Canada. In other courses offered in this program, a high percentage
of students have been (HIGHLY motivated) middle-aged women, and that
will probably be the case with this one again.
I'm very excited about the course but a little worried about which
distro to use in the class. As I said, am only really familiar with
Debian and quite love it; but I do all my sysad work on the command
line and use the menu system very little, so I'm not sure my
experience is especially relevant. I'm worried
that's not the best approach for this class. So, I guess I want to
ask, which distros would folks recommend for the following situation:
- novice computer users, who probably know how to use a web browser,
an email client, and a mouse on windows, but little else;
- relatively slow hardware (hopefully not ancienct, but in any case
not cutting edge);
I'm not looking for beauty or even speed, really; I *am* looking for
out-of-the-box usability, compatibility with both old and new hardware
(especially plugin devices like mp3 players, which are likely used by
the kids of some students), and accessability.
I had a bit of a wake up call this week when I tried out Ubuntu. I
know it's based on Debian, and uses gnome, which really isn't so far
from my desktop, xfce. But I found it surprisingly confusing to use;
having everything hidden behind the gui layer seems quite foreign to
me now. so I really don't want to give folks a distro in which the
ocnf files need constant tweaking, as I've found they sometimes do
in Debian (at least in Sid, which I guess is an unfair comparison).
anyway, thanks as always,
matt
PS: any suggestions as to which list this request really belongs on?
--------------------------
.''`. Matt Price
: :' : Debian User
`. `'` & hemi-geek
`-
--------------------------
if you're an evil spambot, these addresses are for you: [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From jeff Tue Dec 14 17:53:29 2004
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery-Date: Tue Dec 14 09:53:29 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Envelope-to: [email protected]
Delivery-date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 09:53:29 -0800
Received: from exprod5mx124.postini.com ([64.18.0.38] helo=psmtp.com)
by toko.jab.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1CeGrZ-0006fY-00
for <[email protected]>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 09:53:29 -0800
Received: from source ([204.122.16.69]) by exprod5mx124.postini.com
([64.18.4.10]) with SMTP;
Tue, 14 Dec 2004 10:56:08 MST
Received: from ultra6.eskimo.com (IDENT:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [127.0.0.1])
by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id iBEHrbSp032082;
Tue, 14 Dec 2004 09:54:58 -0800
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by ultra6.eskimo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id iBEHrS56032012;
Tue, 14 Dec 2004 09:53:28 -0800
Resent-Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 09:53:28 -0800
X-Authentication-Warning: ultra6.eskimo.com: smartlst set sender to [EMAIL
PROTECTED] using -f
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "Jones Beene" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: OFF TOPIC Keeping up with the times....
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 09:48:37 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0035_01C4E1C2.15B7F960"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441
Resent-Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Resent-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailing-List: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> archive/latest/56957
X-Loop: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
List-Post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-pstn-levels: (S:19.63299/99.89793 R:95.9108 P:91.0781 M:94.8624 C:98.9754 )
X-pstn-settings: 1 (0.1500:0.1500) gt3 gt2 gt1 r p m c
X-pstn-addresses: from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [294/10]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on toko.jab.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE
autolearn=ham version=2.64
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_0035_01C4E1C2.15B7F960
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
The next message, not this one, should be more on-topic. It will be a =
mini-essay entitled "Beyond Cold Fusion and the Hydrino". But when =
trying to find some past research and related material, I came across =
this little bit of humor in my "drafts" box, which now has 378 =
unfinished thoughts in it (so adjust your spam filters accordingly).
The main premise of the on-topic next posting (not this off-topic one) =
is that CANR-LENR and the hydrino are dual aspects of a deceivingly =
complicated subject, which can be called a "simplex" (a subject which =
has been oversimplified so successfully in the past that we tend to =
minimalize its true complexity "on the next lower scale"). Ironically =
the subject is one which mainstream science thought they had totally =
mastered 50 years ago.That subject, of course, being the simplest, and =
at the same time, the most complicated of all matter - the hydrogen =
atom/molecule.
Ah... life is seldom as uncomplicated as we fervently desire it to be. =
Even now in 2004, I can't get my voice telephone fixed (its been =
"occasionally" but not always "out" for 2 weeks despite having DSL work =
perfectly). If it had just failed, they could fix it, but since it =
didn't fail, they can't fix it. Now that is the kind of logic that Harry =
Tuttle can appreciate.
And that is why humans were compelled to invent "nostalgia." It was a =
psychological imperative. But it is almost an act of supreme hubris for =
us human mental-midgets to think that something which comprises most of =
the known universe, hydrogen, could really be 'that' simple (Bohr atom, =
etc.). Oh sure, one has to get down to the minute details, down to a =
picometer geometry really, in order to appreciate the ever-unraveling =
complexity of hydrogen. Maybe the Lamb shift should have given us a hint =
as to what was in store, that Shrodinger was a gross-generalization. =
Even the great Dane himself, a product of another era, had little clue =
about the unraveling, which is just now beginning... but that is to be =
the subject of the second part of this posting. For now, some culture =
commentary.
Speaking of the formerly simple, now unraveling in its complexity, here =
is some slightly risqu=E9 humor to start off your day. It is a tribute =
to "nostalgia" but in the way that only your worst enemy would wish on =
you.
To paraphrase Neal Stephenson and other culture bloggers: It wasn't that =
long ago that in order to connect you brand-spanking new "major =
appliance" purchase (you remember the one - that amazingly advanced '386 =
PC which cost more than your Chevrolet, with less raw MIPs than your =
average teen now has to tote around his "itunes" on these days).... =
anyway to connect that awe-inspiring new device (now a door stop in your =
garage) to any outside source of information (sorry, this was before the =
WWW... we're talking a BBS, which probably had Usenet if you were =
lucky), you would be compelled to go through this bazzaro mating-ritual =
kind of thing, requiring you to pick up the phone, dial the other =
computer's number (often a long distance # ), listen for the first hint =
of an excruciatingly annoying dissonant rasping, and then quickly slam =
the handset down into the rubber cups of your very expensive new, big as =
a shoe-box, hi-tek modem (they practically give them away these days). =
At least the voice lines worked back then.
If your aim was accurate, this now-comic contraption would wrap one of =
its neoprene lips around the earpiece and the other succulent lip around =
the telephone's mouthpiece, consummating a kind of cyber-esques =
soixante-neuf, shuddering eventually, as it was suddenly possessed by =
the spirit of a distant cyber-lover, and begin to hammer out with =
incredible deliberation, a (usually) rather garbled messages in courier =
font, which no self-respecting IBM selectric would touch with a ten bite =
pole. After which, you could calculate that... with amortization, etc. =
the message cost you about $64 and change. But, of course, you had just =
scored the latest news about the upcoming '486 .... Ah.... in short, =
your had the "bug" way back then, in more ways than one... beyond even =
the Harry Tuttle variety, but you were at least glad to get a =
voyeuristic little bit of titillation from watching the modem =
sex-ritual, coz' you wife has frozen up her available sockets when you =
decided to blow the family surplus on the wrong kind of box, so brother, =
all you got left is them down-home "Core Dumped Blues"...=20
Well, my terminal's all locked up, can't get no Mail,=20
can't recall the last time Gopher didn't fail=20
...Got stacks in my 'structs, arrays in my queues,=20
...Got the Segmentation violation: Core dumped blues.
Now, that is anti-nostalgia, or the way it actually was, not the way we =
might desire or wish it had been - in order that we could "wax =
nostalgic" when the brand new Dell does something similar, but several =
layers deeper in the works, so it is much more difficult to find the =
"bug" nowadays ).
Jones
Where is Harry Tuttle when we need him? ... still in the duct-work?
------=_NextPart_000_0035_01C4E1C2.15B7F960
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Dwindows-1252"><BASE=20
href=3D"file://C:\Program Files\Common Files\Microsoft =
Shared\Stationery\">
<STYLE>BODY {
BACKGROUND-POSITION: left top; MARGIN-TOP: 25px; FONT-SIZE: 12pt; =
MARGIN-LEFT: 25px; COLOR: #000000; BACKGROUND-REPEAT: no-repeat; =
FONT-FAMILY: Arial
}
</STYLE>
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2800.1400" name=3DGENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV>
<DIV>The next message, not this one, should be more on-topic. It =
will be a=20
mini-essay entitled "Beyond Cold Fusion and the Hydrino". But when =
trying=20
to find some past research and related material, I came across this =
little bit=20
of humor in my "drafts" box, which now has 378 unfinished thoughts in it =
(so=20
adjust your spam filters accordingly).</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>The main premise of the on-topic next posting (not this off-topic =
one) is=20
that CANR-LENR and the hydrino are dual aspects of a =
deceivingly=20
complicated subject, which can be called a "simplex" (a subject which =
has been=20
oversimplified so successfully in the past that we tend to minimalize =
its true=20
complexity "on the next lower scale"). Ironically the subject is =
one which=20
mainstream science thought they had totally mastered 50 years ago.That =
subject,=20
of course, being the simplest, and at the same time, the most =
complicated of all=20
matter - the hydrogen atom/molecule.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Ah... life is seldom as uncomplicated as we fervently desire it to =
be. Even=20
now in 2004, I can't get my voice telephone fixed (its been =
"occasionally" but=20
not always "out" for 2 weeks despite having DSL work perfectly). If it =
had just=20
failed, they could fix it, but since it didn't fail, they can't fix it. =
Now that=20
is the kind of logic that Harry Tuttle can appreciate.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>And that is why humans were compelled to invent =
"nostalgia." It=20
was a psychological imperative. But it is almost an act of supreme =
hubris for us=20
human mental-midgets to think that something which comprises most =
of the=20
known universe, hydrogen, could really be 'that' simple (Bohr atom, =
etc.).=20
Oh sure, one has to get down to the minute details, down to a picometer=20
geometry really, in order to appreciate the ever-unraveling =
complexity=20
of hydrogen. Maybe the Lamb shift should have given us a hint as to what =
was in=20
store, that Shrodinger was a gross-generalization. Even the great =
Dane=20
himself, a product of another era, had little clue about the =
unraveling,=20
which is just now beginning... but that is to be the subject of the =
second part=20
of this posting. For now, some culture commentary.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Speaking of the formerly simple, now unraveling in its complexity, =
here is=20
some slightly risqu=E9 humor to start off your day. It is a tribute to =
"nostalgia"=20
but in the way that only your worst enemy would wish on you.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>To paraphrase Neal Stephenson and other culture bloggers: It wasn't =
that=20
long ago that in order to connect you brand-spanking new "major =
appliance"=20
purchase (you remember the one - that amazingly advanced '386 =
PC which=20
cost more than your Chevrolet, with less =
raw MIPs than your=20
average teen now has to tote around his "itunes" on these days).... =
anyway to=20
connect that awe-inspiring new device (now a door stop in your =
garage) to=20
any outside source of information (sorry, this was before the =
WWW... we're=20
talking a BBS, which probably had Usenet if you were lucky), you =
would be=20
compelled to go through this bazzaro mating-ritual kind of thing, =
requiring=20
you to pick up the phone, dial the other computer's number (often a long =
distance # ), listen for the first hint of an excruciatingly annoying =
dissonant=20
rasping, and then quickly slam the handset down into the rubber cups of =
your=20
very expensive new, big as a shoe-box, hi-tek modem (they =
practically give=20
them away these days). At least the voice lines worked back then.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>If your aim was accurate, this now-comic contraption would wrap one =
of its=20
neoprene lips around the earpiece and the other succulent lip around the =
telephone's mouthpiece, consummating a kind of cyber-esques =
soixante-neuf,=20
shuddering eventually, as it was suddenly possessed by the spirit of a =
distant=20
cyber-lover, and begin to hammer out with incredible deliberation, a =
(usually)=20
rather garbled messages in courier font, which no =
self-respecting IBM=20
selectric would touch with a ten bite pole. After which, you could =
calculate=20
that... with amortization, etc. the message cost you about $64 and =
change. But,=20
of course, you had just scored the latest news about the upcoming '486 =
....=20
Ah.... in short, your had the "bug" way back then, in more ways than =
one...=20
beyond even the Harry Tuttle variety, but you were at least glad to =
get a=20
voyeuristic little bit of titillation from watching the modem =
sex-ritual, coz'=20
you wife has frozen up her available sockets when you decided to blow =
the family=20
surplus on the wrong kind of box, so brother, all you got left is =
them=20
down-home "Core Dumped Blues"... </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV align=3Dcenter>Well, my terminal's all locked up, can't get no =
Mail,=20
<BR>can't recall the last time Gopher didn't fail <BR>...Got stacks in =
my=20
'structs, arrays in my queues, <BR>...Got the Segmentation violation: =
Core=20
dumped blues.</DIV>
<DIV align=3Dcenter> </DIV>
<DIV align=3Dleft>Now, that is anti-nostalgia, or the way it =
actually was,=20
not the way we might desire or wish it had been - in order that we =
could=20
"wax nostalgic" when the brand new Dell does something similar, but =
several=20
layers deeper in the works, so it is much more difficult to find the =
"bug"=20
nowadays ).</DIV>
<DIV align=3Dleft> </DIV>
<DIV align=3Dleft>Jones</DIV>
<DIV align=3Dleft> </DIV>
<DIV align=3Dleft>Where is Harry Tuttle when we need him? ... still =
in the=20
duct-work?</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV></DIV></DIV></BODY></HTML>
------=_NextPart_000_0035_01C4E1C2.15B7F960--
From jeff Tue Dec 14 17:53:32 2004
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery-Date: Tue Dec 14 09:53:32 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Envelope-to: [email protected]
Delivery-date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 09:53:32 -0800
Received: from exprod5mx123.postini.com ([64.18.0.37] helo=psmtp.com)
by toko.jab.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1CeGrc-0006fP-00
for <[email protected]>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 09:53:32 -0800
Received: from source ([209.237.227.199]) by exprod5mx123.postini.com
([64.18.4.10]) with SMTP;
Tue, 14 Dec 2004 09:56:07 PST
Received: (qmail 36069 invoked by uid 500); 14 Dec 2004 17:20:47 -0000
Mailing-List: contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
list-help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
list-post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (qmail 36008 invoked by uid 99); 14 Dec 2004 17:20:44 -0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=10.0
tests=HTML_60_70,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: domain of [EMAIL PROTECTED] designates
216.75.143.162 as permitted sender)
Received: from vtmail.pkc.com (HELO vtmail.pkc.com) (216.75.143.162)
by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 09:20:40 -0800
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="=_e5191c45f48e67db7f73b0cbde591683"
Subject: RE: Comments in XML.
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 12:20:28 -0500
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
From: "Jesse Pelton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Virus-Checked: Checked
X-pstn-levels: (S:99.90000/99.90000 R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:94.8624 C:98.9754 )
X-pstn-settings: 1 (0.1500:0.0750) GT3 gt2 gt1 r p m c
X-pstn-addresses: from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [294/10]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on toko.jab.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.6 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HTML_50_60,
HTML_FONTCOLOR_BLUE,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.64
--=_e5191c45f48e67db7f73b0cbde591683
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Xerces implements standards. If you can get the W3C XML committee to
incorporate this into the standard, I'm sure Xerces will support it.
However, the fact that it's not already there suggests that it might
not, in fact, be "welcome by all."
________________________________
From: Gill, Prabhprit (Prabh)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2004 10:06 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Comments in XML.
=09
=09
Hi,
=20
Discussions with my colleagues has raised a wish-list item. It
would be nice to have a "nested comment" feature allowing the commenting
of large portions of XML, which itself may contain comments. Currently,
any attempt to do so results in failure at the point the first internal
comment terminates. An example follows:
=20
Consider the following xml, containing comments:
=20
<requesttable name=3D"CT_credentials" required=3D"Y">
<!-- *** ID key column is assumed. *** -->
<!-- *** Add other key columns as required. *** -->
<column name=3D"company" type=3D"C" length=3D"50" >
<column name=3D"username" type=3D"C" length=3D"50" >
<column name=3D"password" type=3D"C" length=3D"16" >
</requesttable>
=20
An attempt to comment out this xml is as follows:
=20
<!--
<requesttable name=3D"CT_credentials" required=3D"Y">
<!-- *** ID key column is assumed. *** -->
<!-- *** Add other key columns as required. *** -->
<column name=3D"company" type=3D"C" length=3D"50" >
<column name=3D"username" type=3D"C" length=3D"50" >
<column name=3D"password" type=3D"C" length=3D"16" >
</requesttable>
-->
=20
which would of course fail when the first comment closes.
However, if the comment parsing was context sensitive this would not
occur.
=20
This is a change to the XML grammar, but we figure that if you
implemented this then all would follow suit. We're certain that such a
change would be welcome by all.
=20
Please let us know what you decide.
=20
Best regards,
Prab.
=20
--=_e5191c45f48e67db7f73b0cbde591683
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Dus-ascii">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2800.1479" name=3DGENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV dir=3Dltr align=3Dleft><SPAN class=3D682021817-14122004><FONT =
face=3DArial=20
color=3D#0000ff size=3D2>Xerces implements standards. If you can get the =
W3C XML=20
committee to incorporate this into the standard, I'm sure Xerces will =
support=20
it. However, the fact that it's not already there suggests that it might =
not, in=20
fact, be "welcome by all."</FONT></SPAN></DIV><BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20
style=3D"PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px =
solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV class=3DOutlookMessageHeader lang=3Den-us dir=3Dltr align=3Dleft>
<HR tabIndex=3D-1>
<FONT face=3DTahoma size=3D2><B>From:</B> Gill, Prabhprit (Prabh)=20
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <BR><B>Sent:</B> Tuesday, =
December 14,=20
2004 10:06 AM<BR><B>To:</B> =
[EMAIL PROTECTED]<BR><B>Subject:</B>=20
Comments in XML.<BR></FONT><BR></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2><SPAN=20
class=3D440235914-14122004>Hi,</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2><SPAN=20
class=3D440235914-14122004></SPAN></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2><SPAN =
class=3D440235914-14122004>Discussions with=20
my colleagues has raised a wish-list item. It would be nice to =
have a=20
"nested comment" feature allowing the commenting of large portions of =
XML,=20
which itself may contain comments. Currently, any attempt to do=20
so results in failure at the point the first =
internal comment=20
terminates. An example follows:</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2><SPAN=20
class=3D440235914-14122004></SPAN></FONT><FONT face=3DArial =
size=3D2><SPAN=20
class=3D440235914-14122004></SPAN></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2><SPAN =
class=3D440235914-14122004>Consider the=20
following xml, containing comments:</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2><SPAN=20
class=3D440235914-14122004></SPAN></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2><SPAN=20
class=3D440235914-14122004> <requesttable =
name=3D"CT_credentials"=20
required=3D"Y"><BR> <!-- =
*** ID=20
key column is assumed. ***=20
--><BR> <!-- *** Add other key columns as =
required.=20
*** --><BR> <column name=3D"company" =
type=3D"C"=20
length=3D"50" ><BR> <column name=3D"username" =
type=3D"C"=20
length=3D"50" ><BR> <column name=3D"password" =
type=3D"C"=20
length=3D"16" ><BR> </requesttable></SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2><SPAN=20
class=3D440235914-14122004></SPAN></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2><SPAN class=3D440235914-14122004>An =
attempt to=20
comment out this xml is as follows:</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2><SPAN=20
class=3D440235914-14122004></SPAN></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2><SPAN=20
class=3D440235914-14122004><!--</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2><SPAN=20
class=3D440235914-14122004> <requesttable =
name=3D"CT_credentials"=20
required=3D"Y"><BR> <!-- =
*** ID=20
key column is assumed. ***=20
--><BR> <!-- *** Add other key columns as =
required.=20
*** --><BR> <column name=3D"company" =
type=3D"C"=20
length=3D"50" ><BR> <column name=3D"username" =
type=3D"C"=20
length=3D"50" ><BR> <column name=3D"password" =
type=3D"C"=20
length=3D"16" ><BR> </requesttable></SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2><SPAN=20
class=3D440235914-14122004>--></SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2><SPAN=20
class=3D440235914-14122004></SPAN></FONT><FONT face=3DArial =
size=3D2><SPAN=20
class=3D440235914-14122004></SPAN></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2><SPAN =
class=3D440235914-14122004>which would of=20
course fail when the first comment closes. However, if the =
comment=20
parsing was context sensitive this would not =
occur.</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2><SPAN=20
class=3D440235914-14122004></SPAN></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2><SPAN class=3D440235914-14122004>This =
is a change=20
to the XML grammar, but we figure that if you implemented this then =
all would=20
follow suit. We're certain that such a change would be welcome =
by=20
all.</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2><SPAN=20
class=3D440235914-14122004></SPAN></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2><SPAN =
class=3D440235914-14122004>Please let us know=20
what you decide.</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2><SPAN=20
class=3D440235914-14122004></SPAN></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2><SPAN class=3D440235914-14122004>Best =
regards,</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2><SPAN =
class=3D440235914-14122004> =20
Prab.</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2><SPAN=20
=
class=3D440235914-14122004></SPAN></FONT> </DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY>=
</HTML>
--=_e5191c45f48e67db7f73b0cbde591683--
From jeff Tue Dec 14 17:57:23 2004
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery-Date: Tue Dec 14 09:57:23 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Envelope-to: [email protected]
Delivery-date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 09:57:23 -0800
Received: from exprod5mx122.postini.com ([64.18.0.36] helo=psmtp.com)
by toko.jab.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1CeGvL-0006g9-00
for <[email protected]>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 09:57:23 -0800
Received: from source ([212.227.126.173]) by exprod5mx122.postini.com
([64.18.4.10]) with SMTP;
Tue, 14 Dec 2004 10:00:01 PST
Received: from [212.227.126.140] (helo=mxng13.kundenserver.de)
by moutng.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1)
id 1CeGxt-0005zX-00
for [email protected]; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 19:00:01 +0100
Received: from [134.102.123.69] (helo=saturn.genealogy.net)
by mxng13.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1)
id 1CeGxs-0002R4-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 19:00:00 +0100
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by saturn.genealogy.net (Postfix on Linux (i386)) with ESMTP id
50B8623AF44
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 19:00:00 +0100 (CET)
Received: from saturn.genealogy.net ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (saturn [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 31619-01 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Tue, 14 Dec 2004 18:59:53 +0100 (CET)
Received: from saturn.genealogy.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by saturn.genealogy.net (Postfix on Linux (i386)) with ESMTP id
3B4AE23B1E9
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 18:58:23 +0100 (CET)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by saturn.genealogy.net (Postfix on Linux (i386)) with ESMTP id
8C32B23B0BB for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Tue, 14 Dec 2004 18:57:58 +0100 (CET)
Received: from saturn.genealogy.net ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (saturn [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 30810-05 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Tue, 14 Dec 2004 18:57:53 +0100 (CET)
Received: from mailout01.sul.t-online.com (mailout01.sul.t-online.com
[194.25.134.80])
by saturn.genealogy.net (Postfix on Linux (i386)) with ESMTP id
F3C2023B0F4 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Tue, 14 Dec 2004 18:57:52 +0100 (CET)
Received: from fwd00.aul.t-online.de by mailout01.sul.t-online.com with smtp
id 1CeGvo-00075X-03; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 18:57:52 +0100
Received: from 127.0.0.1
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
by fwd00.sul.t-online.com
with smtp id 1CeGvZ-0J3sCf0; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 18:57:37 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: [NSL] Schulfreundinnen anno 1897
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Rotraud Ilisch)
To: "Niederschlesien-L" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: T-Online eMail 4.111
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
Charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: Quoted-Printable
Date: 14 Dec 2004 17:57 GMT
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-ID: TWuKC0ZvZeIxah4NugY5aEmZpWN52ciOL9SfNcpphZzd2N4viMVQsT
X-TOI-MSGID: 487e993a-a10f-4412-beb8-97b2ee1d8cea
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at genealogy.net
X-BeenThere: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.3
Precedence: list
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Niederschlesien-L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Id: Familienforschung in Niederschlesien [deutschsprachige,
offene Liste] <niederschlesien-l.genealogy.net>
List-Unsubscribe:
<http://list.genealogy.net/mailman/listinfo/niederschlesien-l>,
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Archive: <http://list.genealogy.net/mailman/private/niederschlesien-l>
List-Post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Subscribe: <http://list.genealogy.net/mailman/listinfo/niederschlesien-l>,
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at genealogy.net
X-Provags-Forward: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -> [email protected]
X-pstn-levels: (S:99.90000/99.90000 R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:94.8624 C:98.9754 )
X-pstn-settings: 1 (0.1500:0.1500) gt3 gt2 gt1 r p m c
X-pstn-addresses: from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [294/10]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on toko.jab.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
version=2.64
Noch ein paar Namen aus dem Poesiealbum meiner Oma. Diesmal die, die sich a=
ls Schulfreundin eingetragen haben. Die k=F6nnen nat=FCrlich etwas j=FCnger=
sein - =E4lter kaum, weil die Volkschule ja nur 8 Klassen hatte, aber sich=
er auch mindestens schon 12, wenn sie ihre Freundinnen waren. Hier sind:
Agnes KROKE, Tschiebsdorf
Ida CONRAD, Silber
Emma LEHRFELD , Tschiebsdorf
Ida HAASE, Silber
Anna HUNERT, Tschiebsdorf
Emma KUNERT, Silber
Anna SCHULZ, Tschiebsdorf
Emma SABDER, Tschiebsdorf
Elene WEIGEL, Mallmitz
Gertrud HOFFMANN, Mallmitz
Marie SCHENDEL, Mallmitz
Selma SCHEUDIENST, Silber
Vielleicht kennt die ja wer? Viele Gr=FC=DFe, Rotraud
--=20
B=E4r & Co
Rotraud Ilisch
Merfeld, Antoniusstr. 11, 48249 D=FClmen
Tel 02594 81745 Fax 02594 84488=20
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.rotraud-ilisch.de
_______________________________________________
Niederschlesien-L mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://list.genealogy.net/mailman/listinfo/niederschlesien-l
From jeff Tue Dec 14 17:57:21 2004
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery-Date: Tue Dec 14 09:57:21 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Envelope-to: [email protected]
Delivery-date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 09:57:21 -0800
Received: from exprod5mx124.postini.com ([64.18.0.38] helo=psmtp.com)
by toko.jab.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1CeGvJ-0006fy-00
for <[email protected]>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 09:57:21 -0800
Received: from source ([207.44.192.103]) by exprod5mx124.postini.com
([64.18.4.10]) with SMTP;
Tue, 14 Dec 2004 10:59:57 MST
Received: from www.glengamoi.com (www.glengamoi.com [127.0.0.1])
by mail.glengamoi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 5FFE85F9067; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 12:29:02 -0500 (EST)
X-Original-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from localhost (www.glengamoi.com [127.0.0.1])
by mail.glengamoi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69BD45F9026
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 12:28:26 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mail.glengamoi.com ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (www.glengamoi.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 00351-02 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Tue, 14 Dec 2004 12:28:25 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mail1.thurweb.ch (mail1.thurweb.ch [213.196.149.34])
by mail.glengamoi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FBE95F9025
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 12:28:25 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (localhost.thurweb.ch [127.0.0.1])
by mail1.thurweb.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5F022C2A0B
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 18:27:48 +0100 (CET)
Received: from mail1.thurweb.ch ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (mail1.thurweb.ch [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 04454-04 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Tue, 14 Dec 2004 18:27:48 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [192.168.1.34] (catv-144-205.tbwil.ch [213.196.144.205])
by mail1.thurweb.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id 691C12C2A09
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 18:27:48 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Christoph Schmid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.3)
Gecko/20040910
X-Accept-Language: de-ch, de-de, de, en-us, en, ko
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Coffeehouse] SQL-Server: aus Null werde 0
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.89.0.0
X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at thurweb.ch
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-BeenThere: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.13
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
List-Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.glengamoi.com/mailman/listinfo/coffeehouse>,
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Id: Das Kaffeehaus f�r Programmierer <coffeehouse.glengamoi.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.glengamoi.com/mailman/listinfo/coffeehouse>,
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Archive: <http://www.glengamoi.com/pipermail/coffeehouse/>
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 18:28:06 +0100
X-pstn-levels: (S:99.90000/99.90000 R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:94.8624 C:98.9754 )
X-pstn-settings: 1 (0.1500:0.1500) gt3 gt2 gt1 r p m c
X-pstn-addresses: from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [294/10]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on toko.jab.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
version=2.64
>
>Sqlserver?
>
>Select isNull(sum(x),0) ...
>
>
Habs gerade getestet und funktioniert wie gew�nscht. Super
Besten Dank
Gruss Christoph
_______________________________________________
Coffeehouse Mailingliste, Postings senden an:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
An-/Abmeldung und Suchfunktion unter:
http://www.glengamoi.com/mailman/listinfo/coffeehouse
From jeff Tue Dec 14 17:57:30 2004
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery-Date: Tue Dec 14 09:57:30 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Envelope-to: [email protected]
Delivery-date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 09:57:30 -0800
Received: from exprod5mx128.postini.com ([64.18.0.42] helo=psmtp.com)
by toko.jab.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1CeGvS-0006gm-00
for <[email protected]>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 09:57:30 -0800
Received: from source ([66.35.250.220]) (using TLSv1) by
exprod5mx128.postini.com ([64.18.4.10]) with SMTP;
Tue, 14 Dec 2004 09:59:50 PST
Received: from sc8-sf-list1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.7]
helo=projects.sourceforge.net)
by sc8-sf-spam2.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.33)
id 1Ce1QH-0007ou-95; Mon, 13 Dec 2004 17:24:17 -0800
Received: from sc8-sf-mx2-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.12]
helo=sc8-sf-mx2.sourceforge.net)
by sc8-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30)
id 1Ce1Pb-0005Os-MA
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 13 Dec 2004 17:23:35 -0800
Received: from [67.15.36.126] (helo=viper.python-hosting.com)
by sc8-sf-mx2.sourceforge.net with esmtp (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256)
(Exim 4.41)
id 1Ce1PY-0006DI-E4
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 13 Dec 2004 17:23:34 -0800
Received: from [192.168.1.50] (66-234-32-93.nyc.cable.nyct.net [66.234.32.93])
(authenticated bits=0)
by viper.python-hosting.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id iBE1G416002851
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=NO)
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 13 Dec 2004 19:16:05
-0600
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619)
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Winston Wolff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: webware-devel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619)
X-Spam-Score: -4.9 (----)
Subject: [Webware-devel] UserKit has 10 failures?
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-BeenThere: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9-sf.net
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webware-devel>,
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Id: <webware-devel.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webware-devel>,
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=webware-devel>
X-Original-Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 20:23:28 -0500
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 20:23:28 -0500
X-pstn-levels: (S:99.90000/99.90000 R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:94.8624 C:98.9754 )
X-pstn-settings: 1 (0.1500:0.0000) gt3 gt2 GT1 r p m c
X-pstn-addresses: from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [294/10]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on toko.jab.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
version=2.64
Are other people getting failures if they run this? I get 10 failures
out of 23 tests.
cd Webware/UserKit/Tests/
python Test.py
-winston
-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/
_______________________________________________
Webware-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webware-devel
From jeff Tue Dec 14 17:57:32 2004
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery-Date: Tue Dec 14 09:57:32 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Envelope-to: [email protected]
Delivery-date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 09:57:32 -0800
Received: from exprod5mx116.postini.com ([64.18.0.88] helo=psmtp.com)
by toko.jab.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1CeGvU-0006h4-00
for <[email protected]>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 09:57:32 -0800
Received: from source ([216.125.202.199]) by exprod5mx116.postini.com
([64.18.4.10]) with SMTP;
Tue, 14 Dec 2004 11:00:11 MST
Received: (qmail 25501 invoked by uid 80); 14 Dec 2004 17:59:44 -0000
Mailing-List: contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (qmail 25493 invoked by alias); 14 Dec 2004 17:59:44 -0000
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavis-ng-0.1.6.4-03dc on tech-geeks.org
From: "Jim Kraft" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 12:01:24 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Thread-Index: AcTiBAl6I+yQQY3cSXiBBV1xJj3t5gAAc1cg
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-AntiVirus: Checked for viruses by Gordano's AntiVirus Software
X-AntiSpam: Checked for restricted content by Gordano's AntiSpam Software
Subject: [tech-geeks] Deleting profiles on server 2000
X-pstn-levels: (S:99.90000/99.90000 R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:94.8624 C:98.9754 )
X-pstn-settings: 1 (0.1500:0.1500) gt3 gt2 gt1 r p m c
X-pstn-addresses: from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [294/10]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on toko.jab.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
version=2.64
I remember some discussion about this a long time ago, but I am trying to
delete some roaming profiles from the server (2000) and am getting errors. I
have ownership since I created it and have given myself full control, yet
all I get is "Cannot delete application Data: Access is denied. The source
file may be in use."
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From jeff Tue Dec 14 17:57:34 2004
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery-Date: Tue Dec 14 09:57:34 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Envelope-to: [email protected]
Delivery-date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 09:57:34 -0800
Received: from exprod5mx56.postini.com ([64.18.0.236] helo=psmtp.com)
by toko.jab.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1CeGvW-0006hD-00
for <[email protected]>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 09:57:34 -0800
Received: from source ([209.237.227.199]) by exprod5mx56.postini.com
([64.18.4.10]) with SMTP;
Tue, 14 Dec 2004 10:00:14 PST
Received: (qmail 55351 invoked by uid 500); 14 Dec 2004 17:27:44 -0000
Mailing-List: contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
list-help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
list-post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (qmail 55340 invoked by uid 99); 14 Dec 2004 17:27:44 -0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0
tests=HTML_MESSAGE
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy)
Received: from mail13.ca.com (HELO mail13.ca.com) (141.202.248.42)
by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 09:27:24 -0800
Received: from usilms22.ca.com ([141.202.201.22]) by mail13.ca.com with
Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713);
Tue, 14 Dec 2004 12:15:40 -0500
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6603.0
content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C4E200.890EA5CA"
Subject: RE: data validation
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 12:15:40 -0500
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: data validation
Thread-Index: AcTh+/chithAw/31TUeEPjf/+BoNJwABXABA
From: "Jairam, Roopnaraine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 Dec 2004 17:15:40.0150 (UTC)
FILETIME=[891D6960:01C4E200]
X-Virus-Checked: Checked
X-pstn-levels: (S:99.90000/99.90000 R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:94.8624 C:98.9754 )
X-pstn-settings: 1 (0.1500:0.0750) GT3 gt2 gt1 r p m c
X-pstn-addresses: from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [294/10]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on toko.jab.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.6 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HTML_60_70,
HTML_FONTCOLOR_UNKNOWN,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.64
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------_=_NextPart_001_01C4E200.890EA5CA
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
What is a client side handler? Do you mean that the client code should
check first before calling the webservice? But if the client is not
written by us then invalid data could still be sent to the server.
=20
_____ =20
From: THOMAS, JAI [AG-Contractor/1000] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2004 11:11 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: data validation
=20
Can't you add a client side handler to do that?
Jai
-----Original Message-----
From: Jairam, Roopnaraine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2004 9:02 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: data validation
Does anyone know how to do this???
=20
=09
_____ =20
From: Jairam, Roopnaraine=20
Sent: Thursday, December 09, 2004 10:30 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: data validation
=20
Hi:
=20
Is there a way for axis to validate data before it is sent to
the web service. Basically the data the client sends should not be null.
When it comes to my web service all the required parameters should not
be null. E.g. if the client is supposed to send a struct that identifies
a client e.g. first name, last name, address1, address2,
city,state,zip1,zip2. All the members of the struct can't be null except
for address2 & zip2. Is there a way to do this?
=20
Thanks in advance.
=20
Vince.
------_=_NextPart_001_01C4E200.890EA5CA
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<html>
<head>
<META HTTP-EQUIV=3D"Content-Type" CONTENT=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Dus-ascii">
<meta name=3DGenerator content=3D"Microsoft Word 11 (filtered)">
<style>
<!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:SimSun;
panose-1:2 1 6 0 3 1 1 1 1 1;}
@font-face
{font-family:Tahoma;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:"[EMAIL PROTECTED]";
panose-1:2 1 6 0 3 1 1 1 1 1;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{color:#606420;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.emailstyle17
{font-family:Arial;
color:windowtext;}
span.emailstyle18
{font-family:Arial;
color:navy;}
span.EmailStyle19
{font-family:Arial;
color:navy;}
@page Section1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.25in 1.0in 1.25in;}
div.Section1
{page:Section1;}
-->
</style>
</head>
<body lang=3DEN-US link=3Dblue vlink=3D"#606420">
<div class=3DSection1>
<p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D2 color=3Dnavy face=3DArial><span =
style=3D'font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy'>What is a client side handler? Do =
you mean
that the client code should check first before calling the webservice? =
But if
the client is not written by us then invalid data could still be sent to =
the
server.</span></font></p>
<p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D2 color=3Dnavy face=3DArial><span =
style=3D'font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy'> </span></font></p>
<div>
<div class=3DMsoNormal align=3Dcenter style=3D'text-align:center'><font =
size=3D3
face=3D"Times New Roman"><span style=3D'font-size:12.0pt'>
<hr size=3D2 width=3D"100%" align=3Dcenter tabindex=3D-1>
</span></font></div>
<p class=3DMsoNormal><b><font size=3D2 face=3DTahoma><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Tahoma;font-weight:bold'>From:</span></font></b><font =
size=3D2
face=3DTahoma><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Tahoma'> =
THOMAS, JAI
[AG-Contractor/1000] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <br>
<b><span style=3D'font-weight:bold'>Sent:</span></b> Tuesday, December =
14, 2004
11:11 AM<br>
<b><span style=3D'font-weight:bold'>To:</span></b> =
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'<br>
<b><span style=3D'font-weight:bold'>Subject:</span></b> RE: data =
validation</span></font></p>
</div>
<p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D3 face=3D"Times New Roman"><span =
style=3D'font-size:
12.0pt'> </span></font></p>
<div>
<p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D2 color=3Dblue face=3DArial><span =
style=3D'font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:blue'>Can't you add a client side handler =
to do
that?</span></font></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D2 color=3Dblue face=3DArial><span =
style=3D'font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:blue'>Jai</span></font></p>
</div>
<blockquote =
style=3D'margin-top:5.0pt;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:5.0pt'>
<p class=3DMsoNormal style=3D'margin-bottom:12.0pt'><font size=3D2 =
face=3DTahoma><span
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Tahoma'>-----Original =
Message-----<br>
<b><span style=3D'font-weight:bold'>From:</span></b> Jairam, Roopnaraine
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]<br>
<b><span style=3D'font-weight:bold'>Sent:</span></b> Tuesday, December =
14, 2004
9:02 AM<br>
<b><span style=3D'font-weight:bold'>To:</span></b> =
[EMAIL PROTECTED]<br>
<b><span style=3D'font-weight:bold'>Subject:</span></b> RE: data =
validation</span></font></p>
<p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D2 color=3Dnavy face=3DArial><span =
style=3D'font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy'>Does anyone know how to do =
this???</span></font></p>
<p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D3 face=3D"Times New Roman"><span =
style=3D'font-size:
12.0pt'> </span></font></p>
<div>
<div class=3DMsoNormal align=3Dcenter style=3D'text-align:center'><font =
size=3D3
face=3D"Times New Roman"><span style=3D'font-size:12.0pt'>
<hr size=3D2 width=3D"100%" align=3Dcenter tabIndex=3D-1>
</span></font></div>
<p class=3DMsoNormal><b><font size=3D2 face=3DTahoma><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Tahoma;font-weight:bold'>From:</span></font></b><font =
size=3D2
face=3DTahoma><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Tahoma'> =
Jairam,
Roopnaraine <br>
<b><span style=3D'font-weight:bold'>Sent:</span></b> Thursday, December =
09, 2004
10:30 AM<br>
<b><span style=3D'font-weight:bold'>To:</span></b> =
[EMAIL PROTECTED]<br>
<b><span style=3D'font-weight:bold'>Subject:</span></b> data =
validation</span></font></p>
</div>
<p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D3 face=3D"Times New Roman"><span =
style=3D'font-size:
12.0pt'> </span></font></p>
<p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D2 face=3DArial><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Arial'>Hi:</span></font></p>
<p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D3 face=3D"Times New Roman"><span =
style=3D'font-size:
12.0pt'> </span></font></p>
<p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D2 face=3DArial><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Arial'>Is there a way for axis to validate data before it is =
sent
to the web service. Basically the data the client sends should not be =
null.
When it comes to my web service all the required parameters should not =
be null.
E.g. if the client is supposed to send a struct that identifies a client =
e.g.
first name, last name, address1, address2, city,state,zip1,zip2. All the
members of the struct can't be null except for address2 & zip2. Is =
there a
way to do this?</span></font></p>
<p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D3 face=3D"Times New Roman"><span =
style=3D'font-size:
12.0pt'> </span></font></p>
<p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D2 face=3DArial><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Arial'>Thanks in advance.</span></font></p>
<p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D3 face=3D"Times New Roman"><span =
style=3D'font-size:
12.0pt'> </span></font></p>
<p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D2 face=3DArial><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Arial'>Vince.</span></font></p>
</blockquote>
</div>
</body>
</html>
------_=_NextPart_001_01C4E200.890EA5CA--
From jeff Tue Dec 14 17:57:27 2004
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery-Date: Tue Dec 14 09:57:27 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Envelope-to: [email protected]
Delivery-date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 09:57:27 -0800
Received: from exprod5mx116.postini.com ([64.18.0.88] helo=psmtp.com)
by toko.jab.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1CeGvP-0006gK-00
for <[email protected]>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 09:57:27 -0800
Received: from source ([69.56.210.194]) (using TLSv1) by
exprod5mx116.postini.com ([64.18.4.10]) with SMTP;
Tue, 14 Dec 2004 10:00:06 PST
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=idea2.anoeticconcepts.com)
by idea2.anoeticconcepts.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
id 1CeGoP-0005VU-Ne; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 11:50:13 -0600
Received: from [64.49.204.174] (helo=server2.shellworld.net ident=root)
by idea2.anoeticconcepts.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256)
(Exim 4.43) id 1CeGoN-0005VL-F1
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 11:50:11 -0600
Received: from server2.shellworld.net ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [127.0.0.1])
by server2.shellworld.net (8.12.10/8.12.8) with ESMTP id iBEHoBkX010715
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 17:50:11 GMT
(envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Received: from localhost ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
by server2.shellworld.net (8.12.10/8.12.8/Submit) with ESMTP id
iBEHoB7o010712
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 11:50:11 -0600 (CST)
X-Authentication-Warning: server2.shellworld.net: h2g2 owned process doing -bs
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 11:50:11 -0600 (CST)
From: Bruce Toews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "PC audio discussion list. " <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]><[EMAIL PROTECTED]><[EMAIL PROTECTED]><[EMAIL
PROTECTED]><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Subject: Re: Irritating beeps with goldwave.
X-BeenThere: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: "PC audio discussion list. " <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Id: "PC audio discussion list. " <pc-audio_pc-audio.org.pc-audio.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://pc-audio.org/mailman/listinfo/pc-audio_pc-audio.org>,
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Subscribe: <http://pc-audio.org/mailman/listinfo/pc-audio_pc-audio.org>,
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any
abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - idea2.anoeticconcepts.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - mail-archive.com
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - pc-audio.org
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-pstn-levels: (S:99.90000/99.90000 R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:94.5022 C:98.9754 )
X-pstn-settings: 1 (0.1500:0.1500) gt3 gt2 gt1 r p m c
X-pstn-addresses: from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [294/10]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on toko.jab.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
version=2.64
Gold Wave now allows for plug-ins such as the SF noise-reduction plug-in.
Bruce
--
Bruce Toews
E-mail and MSN/Windows Messenger: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web Site (including info on my weekly commentaries): http://www.ogts.net
For the best oldies anywhere visit http://www.treasureislandoldies.com
On Tue, 14 Dec 2004, ron scott wrote:
> Hi guys, I'm confused, is it gold wave, or sound forge that is giving the
> problem?
> I didn't think Sony had anything to do with gold wave.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Marijan Janev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "PC audio discussion list. " <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2004 11:39 AM
> Subject: Re: Irritating beeps with goldwave.
>
>
>> Hi Anders,
>> If you buy Sound forge and its noise reduction plug-in you don't need to
> buy
>> Goldwave at all. SF has all you need and much much more. I think that our
>> friend Jarry Richard offers good price for SF.
>> But of course, goldwave also wil satisfy your need but its noise reduction
>> is not so good.
>> The choice is only yours.
>> Good luck!
>> Marijan
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Anders Holmberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> To: "PC audio discussion list. " <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2004 2:02 PM
>> Subject: Re: Irritating beeps with goldwave.
>>
>>
>> Hello!
>> Ok.
>> So i have to buy it then?
>> Its no fun to know that a demo of something sends out beeps because sony
>> wants money.
>> /Anders.
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Gary Wood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> To: "PC audio discussion list. " <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Sent: Monday, December 13, 2004 12:53 AM
>> Subject: Re: Irritating beeps with goldwave.
>>
>>
>>> Hi Anders. I don't know if you're referring to me, but I have the full
>>> version of Soundforge u7.0. I think someone answered my question. I
> got
>>> those beeps because I needed to register my copy of Soundforge, and the
>>> Noisereduction plug-in.
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Anders Holmberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> To: "PC audio discussion list. " <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> Sent: Sunday, December 12, 2004 3:45 PM
>>> Subject: Re: Irritating beeps with goldwave.
>>>
>>>
>>>> Hello!
>>>> Hmm, you don't have a demo of soundforge?
>>>> Sounds very strange to me.
>>>> /Anders.
>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> From: "Gary Wood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>> To: "PC audio discussion list. " <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>> Sent: Sunday, December 12, 2004 6:54 AM
>>>> Subject: Re: Irritating beeps with goldwave.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Anders. When I try to record a file with the Soundforge
>>>>> Noisereduction
>>>>> plug-in, it seems like I hear beeps in the files that used the Noise
>>>>> Reduction plug-in.
>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>> From: "Anders Holmberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>> To: "PC audio discussion list. " <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>> Sent: Saturday, December 11, 2004 4:09 PM
>>>>> Subject: Irritating beeps with goldwave.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hello!
>>>>>> I have the latest version of goldwave and a couple of directx
> plugins
>>>> from
>>>>>> sony.I think they come with the soundforge program i downloaded
> from
>>>> dc++
>>>>>> a
>>>>>> month ago.
>>>>>> Now when i try to use these directx plugins i get some irritating
>> beeps
>>>>>> during the processed sound.
>>>>>> FOr example.
>>>>>> I tried out the sony fx reverb and when i listened to my recording
> i
>>>> hear
>>>>>> some strange beeps within the sound file.
>>>>>> I don't understand what i have done wrong here.
>>>>>> Maybe its because i only have a demo of goldwave or something like
>>>>>> that.
>>>>>> Any help is apreciated.
>>>>>> /Anders.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more...
>>>>>> http://www.pc-audio.org
>>>>>>
>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
>>>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more...
>>>>> http://www.pc-audio.org
>>>>>
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
>>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more...
>>>> http://www.pc-audio.org
>>>>
>>>> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more...
>>> http://www.pc-audio.org
>>>
>>> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more...
>> http://www.pc-audio.org
>>
>> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more...
>> http://www.pc-audio.org
>>
>> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more...
> http://www.pc-audio.org
>
> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
_______________________________________________
PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more...
http://www.pc-audio.org
To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
From jeff Tue Dec 14 17:57:28 2004
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery-Date: Tue Dec 14 09:57:28 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Envelope-to: [email protected]
Delivery-date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 09:57:28 -0800
Received: from exprod5mx116.postini.com ([64.18.0.88] helo=psmtp.com)
by toko.jab.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1CeGvP-0006gT-00
for <[email protected]>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 09:57:27 -0800
Received: from source ([209.237.227.199]) by exprod5mx116.postini.com
([64.18.4.10]) with SMTP;
Tue, 14 Dec 2004 11:00:07 MST
Received: (qmail 52742 invoked by uid 500); 14 Dec 2004 17:27:05 -0000
Mailing-List: contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Id: "Velocity Users List" <velocity-user.jakarta.apache.org>
Reply-To: "Velocity Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (qmail 52716 invoked by uid 99); 14 Dec 2004 17:27:04 -0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0
tests=
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (hermes.apache.org: local policy)
Received: from adsl.fprop.com (HELO adsl.fprop.com) (213.208.101.242)
by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 09:27:00 -0800
Received: from [192.168.0.102] (unknown [192.168.0.102])
by adsl.fprop.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB989117B8E
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 17:26:35 +0000
(GMT)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 17:26:36 +0000
From: Simon Christian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.1 (Windows/20040626)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Velocity Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Custom Resource Loader
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Checked: Checked
X-pstn-levels: (S:99.90000/99.90000 R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:94.8624 C:98.9754 )
X-pstn-settings: 1 (0.1500:0.0750) GT3 gt2 gt1 r p m c
X-pstn-addresses: from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [294/10]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on toko.jab.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
version=2.64
Shinobu Kawai wrote:
> Hi Stan,
>
>
>>Still, I think, it would be a very good idea to slightly redesign
>>VelocityEngine class for better support of IoC setup.
>
>
> ## BTW, what does "IoC" stand for?
>
Inversion of Control
There's some info at the Excalibur project about it:
http://excalibur.apache.org/
- simon
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From jeff Tue Dec 14 17:57:37 2004
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery-Date: Tue Dec 14 09:57:37 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Envelope-to: [email protected]
Delivery-date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 09:57:37 -0800
Received: from exprod5mx62.postini.com ([64.18.0.175] helo=psmtp.com)
by toko.jab.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1CeGvZ-0006hO-00
for <[email protected]>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 09:57:37 -0800
Received: from source ([194.109.24.33]) by exprod5mx62.postini.com
([64.18.4.10]) with SMTP;
Tue, 14 Dec 2004 13:00:16 EST
Received: from bag.python.org (bag.python.org [194.109.207.14])
by smtp-vbr13.xs4all.nl (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id iBEHFaEe040119
for <[email protected]>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 18:15:36 +0100 (CET)
(envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Received: from bag.python.org (bag [127.0.0.1])
by bag.python.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 332FD1E400B
for <[email protected]>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 18:15:36 +0100 (CET)
Path:
news.xs4all.nl!newsspool.news.xs4all.nl!transit3.news.xs4all.nl!transit.news.xs4all.nl!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!wns13feed!worldnet.att.net!attbi_s54.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
From: Steven Bethard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.python
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]><[EMAIL PROTECTED]><[EMAIL PROTECTED]><[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 22
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.9.57.175
X-Complaints-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Trace: attbi_s54 1103044354 24.9.57.175 (Tue, 14 Dec 2004 17:12:34 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 17:12:34 GMT
Organization: Comcast Online
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 17:12:34 GMT
Xref: news.xs4all.nl comp.lang.python:351449
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: while 1 vs while True
X-BeenThere: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language
<python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>,
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Archive: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list>
List-Post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>,
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner
X-pstn-levels: (S:99.90000/99.90000 R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:94.8624 C:98.9754 )
X-pstn-settings: 1 (0.1500:0.1500) gt3 gt2 gt1 r p m c
X-pstn-addresses: from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [294/10]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on toko.jab.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
version=2.64
Steve Holden wrote:
> # Pre 2.2.1 compat.
> try: True, False
> except NameError: True = 1==1; False = 1==0
>
> I believe this should work for all versions up to 2.4, and would also
> work with a 2.5 that made True and False constants. But if anyone can
> prove me wrong it would be you ... :-)
Seems like it might work, though we couldn't have the SyntaxError like
we do for None:
>>> try:
... None
... except NameError:
... None = 0
Traceback (SyntaxError: assignment to None
Note that even though I don't actually enter the except block, I still
get a SyntaxError.
Another Steve
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
From jeff Tue Dec 14 17:57:41 2004
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery-Date: Tue Dec 14 09:57:41 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Envelope-to: [email protected]
Delivery-date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 09:57:41 -0800
Received: from exprod5mx115.postini.com ([64.18.0.87] helo=psmtp.com)
by toko.jab.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1CeGvc-0006hi-00
for <[email protected]>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 09:57:40 -0800
Received: from source ([198.108.1.26]) by exprod5mx115.postini.com
([64.18.4.10]) with SMTP;
Tue, 14 Dec 2004 10:00:20 PST
Received: by trapdoor.merit.edu (Postfix)
id 809E2912F3; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 12:21:41 -0500 (EST)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: by trapdoor.merit.edu (Postfix, from userid 56)
id 47EC491312; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 12:21:41 -0500 (EST)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from segue.merit.edu (segue.merit.edu [198.108.1.41])
by trapdoor.merit.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36498912F3
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 12:21:36 -0500 (EST)
Received: by segue.merit.edu (Postfix)
id 0D56D58EBC; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 12:21:36 -0500 (EST)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from pop-a065d19.pas.sa.earthlink.net
(pop-a065d19.pas.sa.earthlink.net [207.217.121.253])
by segue.merit.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB4E358EAC
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 12:21:33 -0500 (EST)
Received: from user-11fagtg.dsl.mindspring.com ([66.245.67.176]
helo=mindspring.com)
by pop-a065d19.pas.sa.earthlink.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1)
id 1CeGMe-0005JO-00; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 09:21:32 -0800
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 12:18:20 -0500
From: John L Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4)
Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Erik Sundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Server Room Environment
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="------------080101070609060501050904"
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Precedence: bulk
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Loop: nanog
X-pstn-levels: (S:89.93182/99.90000 R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:94.8624 C:98.9754 )
X-pstn-settings: 1 (0.1500:0.1500) gt3 gt2 gt1 r p m c
X-pstn-addresses: from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [294/10]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on toko.jab.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.7 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE,
HTML_TITLE_EMPTY autolearn=no version=2.64
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------080101070609060501050904
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Erik,
What equipment are you going to have in your server room? If you are
going to have printers or tape drives they have different requirements
than all
electronic equipment. How is the equipment placed and where are the air
intakes and air exhaust from the equipment. Where are your HVAC and are
they adding to the room load?
How much heat is the equipment generating?
You want to cool the equipment but you do not want condensation on the
equipment. You do not want totally dry air as the static will damage the
equipment also. You will need to check with the equipment manufacturer
to get "the answer" to this question.
Will you have cubicles in the room for people or will it only be equipment.
Only you can answer this question for your equipment and what ever else
is in the room. Is it a small room or a larger room?
John (ISDN) Lee
Erik Sundberg wrote:
>I have a couple of quick questions about environmental settings for server
>rooms.
>
>What is the ideal temperature and humidity for a server room?
>What is too cold for a server room?
>What should the humidity range be?
>
>Thanks
>Erik
>
>
>
>
>
>
--------------080101070609060501050904
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1">
<title></title>
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#ffffff">
<big>Erik,<br>
<br>
What equipment are you going to have in your server room? If you are
going to have printers or tape drives they have different requirements
than all<br>
electronic equipment. How is the equipment placed and where are the air
intakes and air exhaust from the equipment. Where are your HVAC and are<br>
they adding to the room load?<br>
<br>
How much heat is the equipment generating? <br>
<br>
You want to cool the equipment but you do not want condensation on the
equipment. You do not want totally dry air as the static will damage the<br>
equipment also. You will need to check with the equipment manufacturer
to get "the answer" to this question.<br>
<br>
Will you have cubicles in the room for people or will it only be
equipment.<br>
<br>
Only you can answer this question for your equipment and what ever else
is in the room. Is it a small room or a larger room?<br>
<br>
John (ISDN) Lee</big><br>
<br>
Erik Sundberg wrote:<br>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="[EMAIL PROTECTED]">
<pre wrap="">I have a couple of quick questions about environmental settings
for server
rooms.
What is the ideal temperature and humidity for a server room?
What is too cold for a server room?
What should the humidity range be?
Thanks
Erik
</pre>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>
--------------080101070609060501050904--
