On Tue, Feb 26, 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 04:52:52PM +0100, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
> > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> >
> >> [...]
> >> Upgraded to qt-x11-free-3.0.2-20020226. Note the name change.
> >> [...]
> >> -Name: qt
> >> +Name: qt-x11-free
> >
> > Errr... NO! I veto this. Just because the Trolltech guys use a strange
> > naming scheme should not mean that the OpenPKG package also has to adopt
> > this. We have only a single Qt package and everyone knows Qt under "qt".
> > So the OpenPKG should still read just "qt". So please switch this back
> > to the original name.
>
> I also don't like the new name, and I'm glad you agree. I finally changed it
> after many packaging problems, because rpm was automatically unpacking the qt
> tar file to its new native name /cw/RPM/TMP/qt-x11-free-3.0.2 and not the old
> one. Of course, without my (veto) change the build kept breaking.
Use "Name: qt" and "%setup -q -n qt-x11-free-%{version}".
> I will go back and start again, using the correct name this time. Building
> this big package takes hours, so if you know a safe way to go around the build
> process, please let me know.
Just retry the prep stage with "rpm -bp". The other things you already
checked AFAIK.
Ralf S. Engelschall
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.engelschall.com
______________________________________________________________________
The OpenPKG Project www.openpkg.org
Developer Communication List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
