On Tue, Jul 22, 2003, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote: > Log: > speclint police: add missing %option definitions > > Summary: > Revision Changes Path > 1.38 +2 -0 openpkg-src/mico/mico.spec > ____________________________________________________________________________ > > patch -p0 <<'@@ .' > Index: openpkg-src/mico/mico.spec > ============================================================================ > $ cvs diff -u -r1.37 -r1.38 mico.spec > --- openpkg-src/mico/mico.spec 22 Jul 2003 08:10:51 -0000 1.37 > +++ openpkg-src/mico/mico.spec 22 Jul 2003 19:38:16 -0000 1.38 > @@ -38,6 +38,8 @@ > # package options > %option with_ssl no > %option with_qt no > +%option with_gtk no > +%option with_tcl no > Remember that when options like these are missing from the spec, the solution might not be to simply add them as option statements. In this case, it probably would have been better to remove the dangling conditional statements later in the build logic.
I'm investigating now as to whether we missed a dependency or other place where the added options must be referenced. Regards, Michael
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
