On Fri, Jun 04, 2004, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 04, 2004, Michael Schloh wrote:
>>     similar to libxslt, remove the nonessential and incomplete test for a
>>     C++ preprocessor
>>
> But why aren't you use the sed(1) based solution? It will allow us to
> more easily upgrade the package in the future (because it depends on
> just the Autoconf version instead of the package version). We've chosen
> the sed(1) approach intentionally...
>
A patch(1) based fix has its merits as well, but I'll use the shtool(1)
substitution instead anyway.

-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Development Team, Operations Northern Europe
Cable & Wireless Telecommunications Services

Attachment: pgpWObWBs4T9w.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to