On Tue, Jul 26, 2005, Matthias Kurz wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 24, 2005, Matthias Kurz wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Jul 24, 2005, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
> >
> > > On Sun, Jul 24, 2005, Matthias Kurz wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Sun, Jul 24, 2005, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > On Sun, Jul 24, 2005, Matthias Kurz wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > There is something wrong. I guess with the patch, but i do not know
> > > > > > the background...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Well, the problem is that when a path to a file is given the result
> > > > > > ends in the current dir and not in the "original" dir.
> > > > > > Example: gzip /foo/bar/baz creates ./baz.gz instead of
> > > > > > /foo/bar/baz.gz
> [...]
> > I'm going to change the patch in "gzip" and will copy over the
> > patched gzip.c to the "openpkg" CURRENT package.
>
> Shouldn't there be a MFC ?
Yes, now done for both the "gzip" and "openpkg" packages.
Thanks for the reminder.
Ralf S. Engelschall
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.engelschall.com
______________________________________________________________________
The OpenPKG Project www.openpkg.org
Developer Communication List openpkg-dev@openpkg.org
