-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Ralf S. Engelschall schrieb:
> On Mon, Oct 30, 2006, Steffen Weinreich wrote:
>
>> I am a little bit puzzled. As far as I understood the change from End
>> August sudo should not be longer neccecary for the most tasks to
>> maintain a openpkg instance. In the Progress of upgrading a instance
>> from 2.5 to 2_STABLE I found the following happing:
>>
>> bash-3.00$ /opt/ic3s/bin/openpkg --debug rpm -Uvh --force
>> /opt/ic3s/RPM/PKG/sendmail-8.13.8-2.20061022.ix86-debian3.1-oi.rpm
> You are correct in your understanding, Steve. But I'm sure you were
> catched by a subtle upgrade pitfall: when you are installing the
> bootstrap from 2-STABLE-20061018 the _FIRST TIME_, there is still no
> setuid-wrapper in place (as it comes with this version the first time).
> Hence you _HAVE_ to perform the upgrade step ("openpkg rpm -Uvh") for
> the bootstrap package as _ROOT_ or your <prefix>/bin/openpkg file
> will be not be able to be chown'ed to "root". I'm sure if you do a
> "openpkg rpm -V openpkg" it tells you that the owner/user ("U") on
> <prefix>/bin/openpkg is incorrect. I'm sure it is your management user
> as you performed the upgrade as the management user. Right?
You are right, I was in the impession that the upgrade should have
been run with a sudo via the openpkg build -P but something failed in
this process. thanks for your help,
cheerio
Steve
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFFRmYXQftxpMD/nVkRAnMgAJ9Tly/rFUUA0hHmS3dUqPcCn+PuJwCgiAf2
LjEzCgX9eefrS8d/fhugKeE=
=yTz/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
______________________________________________________________________
The OpenPKG Project www.openpkg.org
Developer Communication List openpkg-dev@openpkg.org
