That was my typo, but still no openpkg-tool on the ftp. All I found starting with 'o' is:
openldap-2.1.22-1.3.0.src.rpm 2003 KB 02-08-2003 06:02:00 openpkg-1.3.0-1.3.0.src.rpm 11255 KB 02-08-2003 06:02:00 openpkg-1.3.0-1.3.0.src.sh 17309 KB 25-08-2003 12:47:00 openssh-3.6.1p2-1.3.0.src.rpm 883 KB 02-08-2003 06:02:00 openssl-0.9.7b-1.3.0.src.rpm 2731 KB 02-08-2003 06:02:00 I do found openpkg-tool-20030919-20030919.src.rpm in the -current release, but don't know if I should/could use it, as it says that the current is potentialy unstable. Cópia Bill Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Tue, Dec 02, 2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >Sorry for asking again, but I whent to Download area of release 1.3 > source > > ( ftp://ftp.openpkg.org/release/1.3/SRC/ )and couldn't find nothing > named > >openpkg-tools. > > It's openpkg-tool (singular). > > >Where do I get it ? > > > >Cópia Bill Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > >> On Tue, Dec 02, 2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> > > >> >Cópia Bill Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> > > >> >> On Tue, Dec 02, 2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> >I couldn't find openpkg-tool. Is it a provided as an OpenPkg > package > >> ? > >> > > >> >When you say to build gcc, you mean I should get > gcc-3.3-1.3.0.src.rpm > >> and do: > >> > /cw/bin/rpm --rebuild gcc-3.3-1.3.0.src.rpm > >> > >> If you install openpkg-tool then do ``openpkg build -K gcc'' it > will > >> figure > >> out the current version and generate a script to rebuild it and all > >> its > >> prerequisites from the proper directories at ftp.openpkg.org. The > >> ``-K'' > >> option tells openpkg to keep prerequisite packages instead of > removing > >> them > >> after the build is complete. > >> > >> >Will I need to install all packages from source, or after building > gcc > >> I could > >> >use some pre-build packages ? > >> > >> I would try to build from source rather than using prebuilt > packages, > >> particularly since Red Hat has a reputation for library > >> inconsistencies. > >> > >> >And as I whant to have 2 installations of OpenPkg (one for real, > and > >> one for > >> >testing/implementing new packages) what matters for the --prefix > is > >> the > >> >real_directiry, and not the symlink I do to /cw ? > >> > >> The symlink won't be meaningful to OpenPKG as it will have the full > >> path > >> name in %{l_prefix} which is then hard-coded in many places (e.g. > the > >> perl > >> spitshell headers). > >> > >> Bill > >> -- > >> INTERNET: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bill Campbell; Celestial Systems, > Inc. > >> UUCP: camco!bill PO Box 820; 6641 E. Mercer Way > >> FAX: (206) 232-9186 Mercer Island, WA 98040-0820; (206) > >> 236-1676 > >> URL: http://www.celestial.com/ > >> > >> ``If the government can take a man's money without his consent, there > is > >> no > >> limit to the additional tyranny it may practise upon him; for, with > >> his > >> money, it can hire soldiers to stand over him, keep him in > subjection, > >> plunder him at discretion, and kill him if he resists.'' > >> Lysander Spooner, 1852 > >> > ______________________________________________________________________ > >> The OpenPKG Project > www.openpkg.org > >> User Communication List > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > >______________________________________________________________________ > >The OpenPKG Project > www.openpkg.org > >User Communication List > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > -- > Bill > -- > INTERNET: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bill Campbell; Celestial Software LLC > UUCP: camco!bill PO Box 820; 6641 E. Mercer Way > FAX: (206) 232-9186 Mercer Island, WA 98040-0820; (206) > 236-1676 > URL: http://www.celestial.com/ > > ``Good luck to all you optimists out there who think Microsoft can > deliver > 35 million lines of quality code on which you can operate your > business.'' > -- John C. Dvorak > ______________________________________________________________________ The OpenPKG Project www.openpkg.org User Communication List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
