Ok, that's what I was thinking as well. I just wanted to confirm my suspicions. Will this be fixed or is it just going to be ignored since the latest release is 2.2 and 2.3 is soon to be released?
On Thu, 2005-02-10 at 07:15 +0100, Michael van Elst wrote: > On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 04:30:27PM -0800, David M. Fetter wrote: > > > openpkg-2.1.2-2.1.2,openpkg-20040825-20040825 > > This is supposed to be one package name with version and revision > information. > > I guess there is a typo in a requirement or provides where the > entries are not whitespace but comma separated. > > Greetings, -- David M. Fetter - UNIX Systems Administrator Portland State University - www.oit.pdx.edu
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
