well the problem seems to be fixing the RPM install phase for AIX. Any ideas welcome
20 Jul 2005 22:15:29 +0200, Simon J Mudd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Doug Summers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Simon, I got past this by doing the following: > > > > 1) Uninstalling binutils (OpenPKG & RPM versions) > > I don't have the binutils rpm installed (AIX rpm). > > > 2) Compiling using --define="with_binutils no" switch > > Did not help me. > > But you are building 3.3.6 not 3.4.4, aren't you? I thought you had > the same assembler error I had with gcc 3.4.4 and 4.0. > > > BTW - I've been compiling on boxes very similar to yours so the CPU's > > shouldn't be an issue. > > Yes, but the build is painfully slow. We have a couple of faster boxes > (one with 16 cpus) but they are production boxes and I can't play with > them unfortunately. > > I'm just going to make sure I _can't_ build gcc 3.4.4 using the AIX > spec file "style commands" using gcc 3.3.2 installed from the AIX > rpm. If that fails I think I can go to the gcc list and ask some > questions. If I don't do that I'll probably get asked to try a "normal" > build anyway. > > And I don't dare try and build 3.3.6 while the 3.4.4 is building ... > > I'm sure we'll get there in the end. Shame no-one at IBM can lend a > helping hand. I'm not familiar enough with either the hardware or the > gcc building process to know what the problem is. > > Simon > ______________________________________________________________________ > The OpenPKG Project www.openpkg.org > User Communication List openpkg-users@openpkg.org > ______________________________________________________________________ The OpenPKG Project www.openpkg.org User Communication List openpkg-users@openpkg.org
