On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 09:17:48PM +0200, Steve Weinreich wrote: > > --On Mittwoch, 12. Oktober 2005 15:54 +0200 Stijn De Weirdt > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >hi all, > > > >i just installed openpkg on scientific linux 3, which is a clone of rhel3. > >so i used > >sh openpkg-2.4.0-2.4.0.ix86-rhel3-openpkg.sh --prefix=/opt/openpkg > >to install openpkg. > >the result was: > > The OpenPKG Binary Pakages are not supposed to be relocated via the > --prefix commandline-option. They life in the /openpkg prefix. If you like > to have a OpenPKG Instance in another prefix use source packages and > rebuild all needed packages from the source. The first package you should > build is a custom openpkg package via > > $ ./openpkg-2.4.0-2.4.0.src.rpm --prefix=/opt/openpkg > > After that you could build more packages using > > % /opt/openpkg/bin/openpkg rpm --rebuild > ftp://ftp.openpkg.org/release/2.4/SRC/foo-X.Y-2.4.0.src.rpm > > or by using openpkg-tools. You can find more documentation on our > website[1] and there is also a nice tutorial[2]. > > [1] http://www.openpkg.org/doc.html > [2] http://www.openpkg.org/tutorial.html
Perhaps the "fault" therefore lies in the "binary" shell script not complaining about the --prefix option being presented to it? $ sh openpkg-2.4.0-2.4.0.ix86-rhel3-openpkg.sh --prefix=/opt/openpkg should give an error???? Regards, Simon ______________________________________________________________________ The OpenPKG Project www.openpkg.org User Communication List openpkg-users@openpkg.org
