On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 4:56 PM, Ralf S. Engelschall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Nov 07, 2008, Alain Spineux wrote: > >> I have some maintenance process running continuously and that are >> disturbed by some services (imapd and openldap) restart near midnight. >> >> It looks like postfix use the fsl's options jitter and monitor to >> avoid a restart. >> Why does imapd and openldap dont use this feature to avoid a daily restart ? > > Well, the jitter and monitor options are expensive and hence they were > used only if it was really necessary. Do imapd and openldap require it?
It depend, if you can tolerate an interruption of the service or not ! Is jiitter and monitor so expensive ? They should just require a call to access() once in a while ? Do I miss something ? I expect to switch to jiitter and monitor for a least : openldap, imapd and mysql and maybe apache and bind. Do you have any comment ? Regards > > Ralf S. Engelschall > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > www.engelschall.com > > ______________________________________________________________________ > OpenPKG http://openpkg.org > User Communication List openpkg-users@openpkg.org > -- Alain Spineux aspineux gmail com May the sources be with you ______________________________________________________________________ OpenPKG http://openpkg.org User Communication List openpkg-users@openpkg.org
