On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 6:00 PM, Iñigo Muguruza
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Dear OpenRISC community,
>
> I write this mail to inform about an issue I have found when I analyzed the
> outcome data coming from or1200 and mor1kx profiling. I am working in making
> a OpenRISC tutorial to help people install and execute the diverse
> open-soruce SoC tools. In this tutorial a profiling test for or1200/mor1kx
> is made. Surprisingly, the results are really different, inducting to think
> about a fault/bug. (results in the attached txts)
>
> In the mor1kx, _reset and or1k_dmu_disable routines, takes really a big
> percentage of the execution, while in or1200 is does not happen the same.
>

It shouldn't ever end up in or1k_dmmu_disable, so obviously
stalling/unstalling mor1kx at some particular spot triggers a bug.
I can reproduce it even manually by hitting ctrl-c + c in gdb
repeatedly many times.
I'll take a closer look what's happening.

Stefan
_______________________________________________
OpenRISC mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openrisc.net/listinfo/openrisc

Reply via email to