Hi Zoran,

yes, it is Ack for #549, #550 and #552(while pushing remove the two lines).

/Neel.

On Thursday 29 August 2013 06:51 PM, Neelakanta Reddy wrote:
> Hi Zoran,
>
> yes, it is Ack for #549, #550 and #552(while pushing remove the two 
> lines).
>
> /Neel.
>
>
> On Thursday 29 August 2013 06:30 PM, Zoran Milinkovic wrote:
>> Hi Neel,
>>
>> Good point.
>> When I was working on the code, I totally forgot it's SaNameT type 
>> and not a string (char *).
>> I will that two lines before I push the code.
>>
>> Is it ack for all three #549, #550 and #552 or only for #552 ?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Zoran
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Neelakanta Reddy [mailto:reddy.neelaka...@oracle.com]
>> Sent: den 29 augusti 2013 14:41
>> To: Zoran Milinkovic
>> Cc: opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0 of 1] Review Request for IMMTOOL: Cleanup the 
>> code and fix memory problem [#552]
>>
>> Hi zoran,
>>
>> Reviewed and tested the patch.
>> Ack with minor comment.
>>
>> comment:
>>
>> Adding "\0" at the end of the string is not required. The imma 
>> saImmOmCcbObjectDelete will take care of adding "\0" at the end of 
>> the object,
>>
>> objectName.value[objectName.length] = 0;
>>
>> your patch worked because you sent only length but not length+1.
>>
>> /Neel.
>>
>> On Tuesday 27 August 2013 05:27 PM, Zoran Milinkovic wrote:
>>> Summary: IMMTOOL: Cleanup the code and fix memory problem [#552]
>>> Review request for Trac Ticket(s): 552 Peer Reviewer(s): Neel Pull
>>> request to: Zoran Affected branch(es): default(4.4) Development
>>> branch: default(4.4)
>>>
>>> --------------------------------
>>> Impacted area       Impact y/n
>>> --------------------------------
>>>    Docs                    n
>>>    Build system            n
>>>    RPM/packaging           n
>>>    Configuration files     n
>>>    Startup scripts         n
>>>    SAF services            n
>>>    OpenSAF services        n
>>>    Core libraries          n
>>>    Samples                 n
>>>    Tests                   y
>>>    Other                   n
>>>
>>>
>>> Comments (indicate scope for each "y" above):
>>> ---------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> changeset 0cdd2a5765b3dbf0a471ddb0c09bd99587ec1e9d
>>> Author:    Zoran Milinkovic <zoran.milinko...@ericsson.com>
>>> Date:    Tue, 27 Aug 2013 10:53:50 +0200
>>>
>>>     IMMTOOL: Cleanup the code and fix memory problem [#552]
>>>
>>>     Cleanup IMM test code and fix memory problems reported by valgrind.
>>>
>>>
>>> Complete diffstat:
>>> ------------------
>>>    tests/immsv/common/immtest.c |   4 ++++
>>>    tests/immsv/implementer/test_SaImmOiRtAttrUpdateCallbackT.c |   2 +-
>>>    tests/immsv/implementer/test_cleanup.c |   3 ++-
>>>    tests/immsv/management/test_cleanup.c |   3 ++-
>>>    tests/immsv/management/test_saImmOmAdminOwnerFinalize.c |   1 +
>>>    tests/immsv/management/test_saImmOmInitialize.c |   1 +
>>>    tests/immsv/management/test_saImmOmThreadInterference.c |  10 
>>> +++++++---
>>>    7 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>>
>>>
>>> Testing Commands:
>>> -----------------
>>> valgrind --leak-check=full --show-reachable=yes immomtest valgrind
>>> --leak-check=full --show-reachable=yes immoitest
>>>
>>>
>>> Testing, Expected Results:
>>> --------------------------
>>> Running immoitest and immomtest using valgrind, valgrind should not 
>>> report any memory leak.
>>>
>>>
>>> Conditions of Submission:
>>> -------------------------
>>> Ack from Neel
>>>
>>>
>>> Arch      Built     Started    Linux distro
>>> -------------------------------------------
>>> mips        n          n
>>> mips64      n          n
>>> x86         n          n
>>> x86_64      n          n
>>> powerpc     n          n
>>> powerpc64   n          n
>>>
>>>
>>> Reviewer Checklist:
>>> -------------------
>>> [Submitters: make sure that your review doesn't trigger any
>>> checkmarks!]
>>>
>>>
>>> Your checkin has not passed review because (see checked entries):
>>>
>>> ___ Your RR template is generally incomplete; it has too many blank 
>>> entries
>>>       that need proper data filled in.
>>>
>>> ___ You have failed to nominate the proper persons for review and push.
>>>
>>> ___ Your patches do not have proper short+long header
>>>
>>> ___ You have grammar/spelling in your header that is unacceptable.
>>>
>>> ___ You have exceeded a sensible line length in your 
>>> headers/comments/text.
>>>
>>> ___ You have failed to put in a proper Trac Ticket # into your commits.
>>>
>>> ___ You have incorrectly put/left internal data in your comments/files
>>>       (i.e. internal bug tracking tool IDs, product names etc)
>>>
>>> ___ You have not given any evidence of testing beyond basic build 
>>> tests.
>>>       Demonstrate some level of runtime or other sanity testing.
>>>
>>> ___ You have ^M present in some of your files. These have to be 
>>> removed.
>>>
>>> ___ You have needlessly changed whitespace or added whitespace crimes
>>>       like trailing spaces, or spaces before tabs.
>>>
>>> ___ You have mixed real technical changes with whitespace and other
>>>       cosmetic code cleanup changes. These have to be separate commits.
>>>
>>> ___ You need to refactor your submission into logical chunks; there is
>>>       too much content into a single commit.
>>>
>>> ___ You have extraneous garbage in your review (merge commits etc)
>>>
>>> ___ You have giant attachments which should never have been sent;
>>>       Instead you should place your content in a public tree to be 
>>> pulled.
>>>
>>> ___ You have too many commits attached to an e-mail; resend as threaded
>>>       commits, or place in a public tree for a pull.
>>>
>>> ___ You have resent this content multiple times without a clear 
>>> indication
>>>       of what has changed between each re-send.
>>>
>>> ___ You have failed to adequately and individually address all of the
>>>       comments and change requests that were proposed in the initial 
>>> review.
>>>
>>> ___ You have a misconfigured ~/.hgrc file (i.e. username, email etc)
>>>
>>> ___ Your computer have a badly configured date and time; confusing the
>>>       the threaded patch review.
>>>
>>> ___ Your changes affect IPC mechanism, and you don't present any 
>>> results
>>>       for in-service upgradability test.
>>>
>>> ___ Your changes affect user manual and documentation, your patch 
>>> series
>>>       do not contain the patch that updates the Doxygen manual.
>>>
>


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Learn the latest--Visual Studio 2012, SharePoint 2013, SQL 2012, more!
Discover the easy way to master current and previous Microsoft technologies
and advance your career. Get an incredible 1,500+ hours of step-by-step
tutorial videos with LearnDevNow. Subscribe today and save!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=58040911&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Opensaf-devel mailing list
Opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensaf-devel

Reply via email to