Summary: logsv: Fix time formatting for logrecords, @Cd and @CD [#565]
Review request for Trac Ticket(s): #565
Peer Reviewer(s): mathi.naic...@oracle.com hans.fe...@ericsson.com
Pull request to: 
Affected branch(es): 4.2.x, 4.3.x, 4.4.x 
Development branch: 4.4.x

--------------------------------
Impacted area       Impact y/n
--------------------------------
 Docs                    n
 Build system            n
 RPM/packaging           n
 Configuration files     n
 Startup scripts         n
 SAF services            n
 OpenSAF services        y
 Core libraries          n
 Samples                 n
 Tests                   n
 Other                   n


Comments (indicate scope for each "y" above):
---------------------------------------------
Fix problem with not knowing when a system or application log record is written
Note: Token @Cd and @CD is not correctly specified in AIS spec.

changeset 146ef18497794edeedf9a14b17a6b4d964f50386
Author: Lennart Lund <lennart.l...@ericsson.com>
Date:   Mon, 30 Sep 2013 12:05:53 +0200

        logsv: Fix time formatting for logrecords, @Cd and @CD [#565]

         - Changes meaning of @Cd from day name to day number
         - Adds new token @CD for day name


Complete diffstat:
------------------
 osaf/services/saf/logsv/lgs/lgs_fmt.c |  27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 osaf/services/saf/logsv/lgs/lgs_fmt.h |   4 ++++
 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)


Testing Commands:
-----------------
Tool saflogger can be used for creating an appliction log record.
Note that it is not possible to change formatting when using saflogger.
A possible way to test @CD is to "hack" the #define DEFAULT_FORMAT_EXPRESSION
in the saflogger tool. See file saf_logger.c


Testing, Expected Results:
--------------------------
Timestamp in log records shall contain day nr instead of day name.
If @CD is added to saflogger format string also day name shall be seen


Conditions of Submission:
-------------------------
Ack from reviewers or end of week


Arch      Built     Started    Linux distro
-------------------------------------------
mips        n          n
mips64      n          n
x86         n          n
x86_64      n          n
powerpc     n          n
powerpc64   n          n


Reviewer Checklist:
-------------------
[Submitters: make sure that your review doesn't trigger any checkmarks!]


Your checkin has not passed review because (see checked entries):

___ Your RR template is generally incomplete; it has too many blank entries
    that need proper data filled in.

___ You have failed to nominate the proper persons for review and push.

___ Your patches do not have proper short+long header

___ You have grammar/spelling in your header that is unacceptable.

___ You have exceeded a sensible line length in your headers/comments/text.

___ You have failed to put in a proper Trac Ticket # into your commits.

___ You have incorrectly put/left internal data in your comments/files
    (i.e. internal bug tracking tool IDs, product names etc)

___ You have not given any evidence of testing beyond basic build tests.
    Demonstrate some level of runtime or other sanity testing.

___ You have ^M present in some of your files. These have to be removed.

___ You have needlessly changed whitespace or added whitespace crimes
    like trailing spaces, or spaces before tabs.

___ You have mixed real technical changes with whitespace and other
    cosmetic code cleanup changes. These have to be separate commits.

___ You need to refactor your submission into logical chunks; there is
    too much content into a single commit.

___ You have extraneous garbage in your review (merge commits etc)

___ You have giant attachments which should never have been sent;
    Instead you should place your content in a public tree to be pulled.

___ You have too many commits attached to an e-mail; resend as threaded
    commits, or place in a public tree for a pull.

___ You have resent this content multiple times without a clear indication
    of what has changed between each re-send.

___ You have failed to adequately and individually address all of the
    comments and change requests that were proposed in the initial review.

___ You have a misconfigured ~/.hgrc file (i.e. username, email etc)

___ Your computer have a badly configured date and time; confusing the
    the threaded patch review.

___ Your changes affect IPC mechanism, and you don't present any results
    for in-service upgradability test.

___ Your changes affect user manual and documentation, your patch series
    do not contain the patch that updates the Doxygen manual.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
October Webinars: Code for Performance
Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance.
Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most from 
the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register >
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60133471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Opensaf-devel mailing list
Opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensaf-devel

Reply via email to