Summary: amfd: Decrement num_attributes when last attrValue is deleted  [#302] 
Review request for Trac Ticket(s): #302
Peer Reviewer(s): Hans F, Hans N 
Pull request to: <<LIST THE PERSON WITH PUSH ACCESS HERE>>
Affected branch(es): All
Development branch: Default 

--------------------------------
Impacted area       Impact y/n
--------------------------------
 Docs                    n
 Build system            n
 RPM/packaging           n
 Configuration files     n
 Startup scripts         n
 SAF services            y
 OpenSAF services        n
 Core libraries          n
 Samples                 n
 Tests                   n
 Other                   n


Comments (indicate scope for each "y" above):
---------------------------------------------
 <<EXPLAIN/COMMENT THE PATCH SERIES HERE>>

changeset fde0ad4e97928c22038d65c1607a99b6c71df787
Author: Nagendra Kumar<nagendr...@oracle.com>
Date:   Mon, 25 Nov 2013 20:40:18 +0530

        amfd: Decrement num_attributes when last attrValue is deleted [#302]


Complete diffstat:
------------------
 osaf/services/saf/amf/amfd/csiattr.cc |  2 ++
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)


Testing Commands:
-----------------
immcfg -f  /tmp/AppConfig-2N.xml
immcfg -c SaAmfCSIAttribute 
safCsiAttr=Attr1,safCsi=AmfDemo,safSi=AmfDemo,safApp=AmfDemo1 -a 
saAmfCSIAttriValue=val1
immcfg -a saAmfCSIAttriValue-=val1 
safCsiAttr=Attr1,safCsi=AmfDemo,safSi=AmfDemo,safApp=AmfDemo1

immcfg -a saAmfCSIAttriValue+=val2 
safCsiAttr=Attr1,safCsi=AmfDemo,safSi=AmfDemo,safApp=AmfDemo1

immcfg -a saAmfCSIAttriValue+=val3 
safCsiAttr=Attr1,safCsi=AmfDemo,safSi=AmfDemo,safApp=AmfDemo1
amf-adm unlock-in safSu=SU1,safSg=AmfDemo,safApp=AmfDemo1
amf-adm unlock safSu=SU1,safSg=AmfDemo,safApp=AmfDemo1


Testing, Expected Results:
--------------------------
Callback should deliver only val2 and val3 as attrValue.


Conditions of Submission:
-------------------------
Ack from peer reviewers


Arch      Built     Started    Linux distro
-------------------------------------------
mips        n          n
mips64      n          n
x86         n          n
x86_64      y          y
powerpc     n          n
powerpc64   n          n


Reviewer Checklist:
-------------------
[Submitters: make sure that your review doesn't trigger any checkmarks!]


Your checkin has not passed review because (see checked entries):

___ Your RR template is generally incomplete; it has too many blank entries
    that need proper data filled in.

___ You have failed to nominate the proper persons for review and push.

___ Your patches do not have proper short+long header

___ You have grammar/spelling in your header that is unacceptable.

___ You have exceeded a sensible line length in your headers/comments/text.

___ You have failed to put in a proper Trac Ticket # into your commits.

___ You have incorrectly put/left internal data in your comments/files
    (i.e. internal bug tracking tool IDs, product names etc)

___ You have not given any evidence of testing beyond basic build tests.
    Demonstrate some level of runtime or other sanity testing.

___ You have ^M present in some of your files. These have to be removed.

___ You have needlessly changed whitespace or added whitespace crimes
    like trailing spaces, or spaces before tabs.

___ You have mixed real technical changes with whitespace and other
    cosmetic code cleanup changes. These have to be separate commits.

___ You need to refactor your submission into logical chunks; there is
    too much content into a single commit.

___ You have extraneous garbage in your review (merge commits etc)

___ You have giant attachments which should never have been sent;
    Instead you should place your content in a public tree to be pulled.

___ You have too many commits attached to an e-mail; resend as threaded
    commits, or place in a public tree for a pull.

___ You have resent this content multiple times without a clear indication
    of what has changed between each re-send.

___ You have failed to adequately and individually address all of the
    comments and change requests that were proposed in the initial review.

___ You have a misconfigured ~/.hgrc file (i.e. username, email etc)

___ Your computer have a badly configured date and time; confusing the
    the threaded patch review.

___ Your changes affect IPC mechanism, and you don't present any results
    for in-service upgradability test.

___ Your changes affect user manual and documentation, your patch series
    do not contain the patch that updates the Doxygen manual.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Shape the Mobile Experience: Free Subscription
Software experts and developers: Be at the forefront of tech innovation.
Intel(R) Software Adrenaline delivers strategic insight and game-changing 
conversations that shape the rapidly evolving mobile landscape. Sign up now. 
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=63431311&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Opensaf-devel mailing list
Opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensaf-devel

Reply via email to