Hi Mathi,

OpenSAF fails to compile after pushing the patch #219.

  CC     clmtest-tet_saClmResponse.o
../../tests/clmsv/src/tet_saClmResponse.c: In function 'saClmResponse_01':
../../tests/clmsv/src/tet_saClmResponse.c:94:13: error: variable 'ret' set but 
not used [-Werror=unused-but-set-variable]
../../tests/clmsv/src/tet_saClmResponse.c: In function 'saClmResponse_02':
../../tests/clmsv/src/tet_saClmResponse.c:134:13: error: variable 'ret' set but 
not used [-Werror=unused-but-set-variable]
../../tests/clmsv/src/tet_saClmResponse.c: In function 'saClmResponse_03':
../../tests/clmsv/src/tet_saClmResponse.c:175:13: error: variable 'ret' set but 
not used [-Werror=unused-but-set-variable]
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
make[2]: *** [clmtest-tet_saClmResponse.o] Error 1

Best regards,
Zoran

-----Original Message-----
From: mathi.naic...@oracle.com [mailto:mathi.naic...@oracle.com] 
Sent: den 30 december 2013 13:56
To: ramesh.bet...@oracle.com
Cc: opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [devel] [PATCH 0 of 1] Review Request for clm: fix test suites [#219]

Summary: clm: fix test suites [#219]
Review request for Trac Ticket(s): #219
Peer Reviewer(s): Ramesh
Pull request to: <<LIST THE PERSON WITH PUSH ACCESS HERE>> Affected branch(es): 
<<LIST ALL AFFECTED BRANCH(ES)>> Development branch: <<IF ANY GIVE THE REPO 
URL>>

--------------------------------
Impacted area       Impact y/n
--------------------------------
 Docs                    n
 Build system            n
 RPM/packaging           n
 Configuration files     n
 Startup scripts         n
 SAF services            n
 OpenSAF services        n
 Core libraries          n
 Samples                 n
 Tests                   y
 Other                   n


Comments (indicate scope for each "y" above):
---------------------------------------------
This patch attempts a stab at fixing the CLM test suites.

changeset 8c074b46a75594e2b64a74ab71839b8c725e4dcd
Author: Mathivanan N.P.<mathi.naic...@oracle.com>
Date:   Mon, 30 Dec 2013 18:22:04 +0530

        clm: fix test suites [#219] Test suites 7 and 9, even though can be run
        manually, it is not guaranteed to succeed always because it involves 
admin
        operations on CLM nodes and by default it works on PL-3. 9 would require
        manual run in parallel with admin operations. This is just a first stab


Complete diffstat:
------------------
 tests/clmsv/src/tet_ClmOiOps.c                     |  12 ++++++------
 tests/clmsv/src/tet_saClmClusterNodeGet.c          |  31 
++++++++++++-------------------
 tests/clmsv/src/tet_saClmClusterNodeGetAsync.c     |   4 ++--
 tests/clmsv/src/tet_saClmClusterNotificationFree.c |   2 +-
 tests/clmsv/src/tet_saClmClusterTrack.c            |  52 
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
 tests/clmsv/src/tet_saClmClusterTrackStop.c        |   4 ++--
 tests/clmsv/src/tet_saClmResponse.c                |  91 
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
 7 files changed, 140 insertions(+), 56 deletions(-)


Testing Commands:
-----------------
./clmtest 1 ... 10

Testing, Expected Results:
--------------------------
Except one or two, the rest of them should pass.

Conditions of Submission:
-------------------------
Ack from Ramesh or timeout on thursday.

Arch      Built     Started    Linux distro
-------------------------------------------
mips        n          n
mips64      n          n
x86         n          n
x86_64      y          y 
powerpc     n          n
powerpc64   n          n


Reviewer Checklist:
-------------------
[Submitters: make sure that your review doesn't trigger any checkmarks!]


Your checkin has not passed review because (see checked entries):

___ Your RR template is generally incomplete; it has too many blank entries
    that need proper data filled in.

___ You have failed to nominate the proper persons for review and push.

___ Your patches do not have proper short+long header

___ You have grammar/spelling in your header that is unacceptable.

___ You have exceeded a sensible line length in your headers/comments/text.

___ You have failed to put in a proper Trac Ticket # into your commits.

___ You have incorrectly put/left internal data in your comments/files
    (i.e. internal bug tracking tool IDs, product names etc)

___ You have not given any evidence of testing beyond basic build tests.
    Demonstrate some level of runtime or other sanity testing.

___ You have ^M present in some of your files. These have to be removed.

___ You have needlessly changed whitespace or added whitespace crimes
    like trailing spaces, or spaces before tabs.

___ You have mixed real technical changes with whitespace and other
    cosmetic code cleanup changes. These have to be separate commits.

___ You need to refactor your submission into logical chunks; there is
    too much content into a single commit.

___ You have extraneous garbage in your review (merge commits etc)

___ You have giant attachments which should never have been sent;
    Instead you should place your content in a public tree to be pulled.

___ You have too many commits attached to an e-mail; resend as threaded
    commits, or place in a public tree for a pull.

___ You have resent this content multiple times without a clear indication
    of what has changed between each re-send.

___ You have failed to adequately and individually address all of the
    comments and change requests that were proposed in the initial review.

___ You have a misconfigured ~/.hgrc file (i.e. username, email etc)

___ Your computer have a badly configured date and time; confusing the
    the threaded patch review.

___ Your changes affect IPC mechanism, and you don't present any results
    for in-service upgradability test.

___ Your changes affect user manual and documentation, your patch series
    do not contain the patch that updates the Doxygen manual.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT 
organizations don't have a clear picture of how application performance affects 
their revenue. With AppDynamics, you get 100% visibility into your Java,.NET, & 
PHP application. Start your 15-day FREE TRIAL of AppDynamics Pro!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=84349831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Opensaf-devel mailing list
Opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensaf-devel

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT 
organizations don't have a clear picture of how application performance 
affects their revenue. With AppDynamics, you get 100% visibility into your 
Java,.NET, & PHP application. Start your 15-day FREE TRIAL of AppDynamics Pro!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=84349831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Opensaf-devel mailing list
Opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensaf-devel

Reply via email to