Summary: amfd : decrement actv assignment count of SI with SUSI in actv modify 
state in sufailover [#666] 
Review request for Trac Ticket(s):#666 
Peer Reviewer(s):Hans F., Nagendra 
Pull request to: <<LIST THE PERSON WITH PUSH ACCESS HERE>>
Affected branch(es): Default 
Development branch: <<IF ANY GIVE THE REPO URL>>

--------------------------------
Impacted area       Impact y/n
--------------------------------
 Docs                    n
 Build system            n
 RPM/packaging           n
 Configuration files     n
 Startup scripts         n
 SAF services            y
 OpenSAF services        n
 Core libraries          n
 Samples                 n
 Tests                   n
 Other                   n


Comments (indicate scope for each "y" above):
---------------------------------------------
Please see the tickets #666, #678, #699, #697 and commit log below.

changeset 389de91a42adbf6f44c0d8149e1b21e65abae0ec
Author: [email protected]
Date:   Mon, 06 Jan 2014 15:12:07 +0530

        amfd : decrement actv assignment count of SI with SUSI in actv modify 
state
        in sufailover [#666] AMF increments active assignment counter
        (saAmfSINumCurrActiveAssignments) in SI when it sends modify active
        assignment to a SU. If sufailover occurs when a SU is in modify active
        state, then AMF should decrement the count before deleting its SUSI. 
This
        patch ensures that saAmfSINumCurrActiveAssignments is decremented for 
SIs
        which are in active modify state during suFailover.


Complete diffstat:
------------------
 osaf/services/saf/amf/amfd/sgproc.cc |  8 ++++++++
 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)


Testing Commands:
-----------------
Tested #666, #678, #699, #697.
First they are reproduced with simple configurations.
All these configurations will be attached in the ticket.

Testing, Expected Results:
--------------------------
Assignment counters are proper and thus assignment states.

Conditions of Submission:
-------------------------
Ack from Nagendra or Hans F.

Arch      Built     Started    Linux distro
-------------------------------------------
mips        n          n
mips64      n          n
x86         y          y
x86_64      n          n
powerpc     n          n
powerpc64   n          n


Reviewer Checklist:
-------------------
[Submitters: make sure that your review doesn't trigger any checkmarks!]


Your checkin has not passed review because (see checked entries):

___ Your RR template is generally incomplete; it has too many blank entries
    that need proper data filled in.

___ You have failed to nominate the proper persons for review and push.

___ Your patches do not have proper short+long header

___ You have grammar/spelling in your header that is unacceptable.

___ You have exceeded a sensible line length in your headers/comments/text.

___ You have failed to put in a proper Trac Ticket # into your commits.

___ You have incorrectly put/left internal data in your comments/files
    (i.e. internal bug tracking tool IDs, product names etc)

___ You have not given any evidence of testing beyond basic build tests.
    Demonstrate some level of runtime or other sanity testing.

___ You have ^M present in some of your files. These have to be removed.

___ You have needlessly changed whitespace or added whitespace crimes
    like trailing spaces, or spaces before tabs.

___ You have mixed real technical changes with whitespace and other
    cosmetic code cleanup changes. These have to be separate commits.

___ You need to refactor your submission into logical chunks; there is
    too much content into a single commit.

___ You have extraneous garbage in your review (merge commits etc)

___ You have giant attachments which should never have been sent;
    Instead you should place your content in a public tree to be pulled.

___ You have too many commits attached to an e-mail; resend as threaded
    commits, or place in a public tree for a pull.

___ You have resent this content multiple times without a clear indication
    of what has changed between each re-send.

___ You have failed to adequately and individually address all of the
    comments and change requests that were proposed in the initial review.

___ You have a misconfigured ~/.hgrc file (i.e. username, email etc)

___ Your computer have a badly configured date and time; confusing the
    the threaded patch review.

___ Your changes affect IPC mechanism, and you don't present any results
    for in-service upgradability test.

___ Your changes affect user manual and documentation, your patch series
    do not contain the patch that updates the Doxygen manual.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT 
organizations don't have a clear picture of how application performance 
affects their revenue. With AppDynamics, you get 100% visibility into your 
Java,.NET, & PHP application. Start your 15-day FREE TRIAL of AppDynamics Pro!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=84349831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Opensaf-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensaf-devel

Reply via email to