Hi Anders,

Ack from me,
Zoran

-----Original Message-----
From: Anders Björnerstedt 
Sent: den 30 januari 2014 14:23
To: reddy.neelaka...@oracle.com; Zoran Milinkovic; sirisha.a...@oracle.com
Cc: opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [PATCH 0 of 1] Review Request for IMM: README clarified ccb-op return 
codes for NO_DANGLING errors (#754)

Summary: IMM: README clarified ccb-op return codes for NO_DANGLING errors 
(#754) Review request for Trac Ticket(s): 754 Peer Reviewer(s): Neel, Sirisha, 
Zoran Pull request to: 
Affected branch(es): 4.4; default(4.5)
Development branch: 

--------------------------------
Impacted area       Impact y/n
--------------------------------
 Docs                    y
 Build system            n
 RPM/packaging           n
 Configuration files     n
 Startup scripts         n
 SAF services            y
 OpenSAF services        n
 Core libraries          n
 Samples                 n
 Tests                   n
 Other                   n


Comments (indicate scope for each "y" above):
---------------------------------------------

changeset 20857d0d451e3b89befc70eb614b98741fb1932e
Author: Anders Bjornerstedt <anders.bjornerst...@ericsson.com>
Date:   Thu, 30 Jan 2014 14:15:57 +0100

        IMM: README clarified ccb-op return codes for NO_DANGLING errors (#754)


Complete diffstat:
------------------
 osaf/services/saf/immsv/README.NO_DANGLING |  36 
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
 1 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)


Testing Commands:
-----------------

Testing, Expected Results:
--------------------------

Conditions of Submission:
-------------------------

Arch      Built     Started    Linux distro
-------------------------------------------
mips        n          n
mips64      n          n
x86         n          n
x86_64      n          n
powerpc     n          n
powerpc64   n          n


Reviewer Checklist:
-------------------
[Submitters: make sure that your review doesn't trigger any checkmarks!]


Your checkin has not passed review because (see checked entries):

___ Your RR template is generally incomplete; it has too many blank entries
    that need proper data filled in.

___ You have failed to nominate the proper persons for review and push.

___ Your patches do not have proper short+long header

___ You have grammar/spelling in your header that is unacceptable.

___ You have exceeded a sensible line length in your headers/comments/text.

___ You have failed to put in a proper Trac Ticket # into your commits.

___ You have incorrectly put/left internal data in your comments/files
    (i.e. internal bug tracking tool IDs, product names etc)

___ You have not given any evidence of testing beyond basic build tests.
    Demonstrate some level of runtime or other sanity testing.

___ You have ^M present in some of your files. These have to be removed.

___ You have needlessly changed whitespace or added whitespace crimes
    like trailing spaces, or spaces before tabs.

___ You have mixed real technical changes with whitespace and other
    cosmetic code cleanup changes. These have to be separate commits.

___ You need to refactor your submission into logical chunks; there is
    too much content into a single commit.

___ You have extraneous garbage in your review (merge commits etc)

___ You have giant attachments which should never have been sent;
    Instead you should place your content in a public tree to be pulled.

___ You have too many commits attached to an e-mail; resend as threaded
    commits, or place in a public tree for a pull.

___ You have resent this content multiple times without a clear indication
    of what has changed between each re-send.

___ You have failed to adequately and individually address all of the
    comments and change requests that were proposed in the initial review.

___ You have a misconfigured ~/.hgrc file (i.e. username, email etc)

___ Your computer have a badly configured date and time; confusing the
    the threaded patch review.

___ Your changes affect IPC mechanism, and you don't present any results
    for in-service upgradability test.

___ Your changes affect user manual and documentation, your patch series
    do not contain the patch that updates the Doxygen manual.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WatchGuard Dimension instantly turns raw network data into actionable 
security intelligence. It gives you real-time visual feedback on key
security issues and trends.  Skip the complicated setup - simply import
a virtual appliance and go from zero to informed in seconds.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=123612991&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Opensaf-devel mailing list
Opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensaf-devel

Reply via email to