Any feedback? I would like to push asap.
/Hans

On 01/28/2014 02:41 PM, Hans Feldt wrote:
> Summary: AMF #662 v2
> Review request for Trac Ticket(s): 662
> Peer Reviewer(s): Nags
> Pull request to: <<LIST THE PERSON WITH PUSH ACCESS HERE>>
> Affected branch(es): 4.4 & default
> Development branch: 4.4
>
> --------------------------------
> Impacted area       Impact y/n
> --------------------------------
>   Docs                    n
>   Build system            n
>   RPM/packaging           n
>   Configuration files     n
>   Startup scripts         n
>   SAF services            y
>   OpenSAF services        n
>   Core libraries          n
>   Samples                 n
>   Tests                   n
>   Other                   n
>
>
> Comments (indicate scope for each "y" above):
> ---------------------------------------------
> Version 2 of the patches after comments by Nags. Not incorporated is the 
> change
> that would be backwards incompatible. Some really nice code simplification was
> achieved using a common function. Complexity numbers decreased.
>
> changeset c2385377f99d2ff4b710ecfc36861cc882e95b36
> Author:       Hans Feldt <[email protected]>
> Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 14:29:38 +0100
>
>       amfd: require saAmfCtSwBundle when relpath in CLC-CLI cmds [#662]
>
> changeset 402e4d387034a4f72ebe9b6ba2a8d760af6039a4
> Author:       Hans Feldt <[email protected]>
> Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 14:33:33 +0100
>
>       amfnd: ignore saAmfCtSwBundle when abspath in CLC-CLI cmds [#662]
>
>
> Complete diffstat:
> ------------------
>   osaf/services/saf/amf/amfd/comptype.cc |  147 
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
>   osaf/services/saf/amf/amfnd/compdb.cc  |  290 
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>   2 files changed, 215 insertions(+), 222 deletions(-)
>
>
> Testing Commands:
> -----------------
>   Start single node cluster
>   Add appconfig.xml with all types of commands, configure cmd and argv in type
>       and argv in comp instance
>       some with relpath some with abspath
>   (appconfig.xml attached to ticket)
>
>
> Testing, Expected Results:
> --------------------------
>   from amfnd trace:
>
> Jan 28 14:28:34.944887 osafamfnd [4569:compdb.cc:1214] TR 
> cmd=/home/hasse/test/amf-601/amf_demo_script instantiate dummy
> Jan 28 14:28:34.944907 osafamfnd [4569:compdb.cc:1214] TR 
> cmd=/home/hasse/test/amf-601/amf_demo_script terminate dummy-cleanup
> Jan 28 14:28:34.944928 osafamfnd [4569:compdb.cc:1214] TR 
> cmd=/home/hasse/test/amf-601/amf_demo_script cleanup dummy-cleanup
> Jan 28 14:28:34.944957 osafamfnd [4569:compdb.cc:1214] TR cmd=/bin/true 
> amstart dummy-amstart
> Jan 28 14:28:34.944978 osafamfnd [4569:compdb.cc:1214] TR cmd=/bin/true 
> amstop dummy-amstop
> Jan 28 14:28:34.945000 osafamfnd [4569:compdb.cc:1214] TR cmd=/bin/true 
> status dummy-osafhc
>
>
>
> Conditions of Submission:
> -------------------------
>   Ack from Nags
>
>
> Arch      Built     Started    Linux distro
> -------------------------------------------
> mips        n          n
> mips64      n          n
> x86         n          n
> x86_64      y          y        ubuntu13.10
> powerpc     n          n
> powerpc64   n          n
>
>
> Reviewer Checklist:
> -------------------
> [Submitters: make sure that your review doesn't trigger any checkmarks!]
>
>
> Your checkin has not passed review because (see checked entries):
>
> ___ Your RR template is generally incomplete; it has too many blank entries
>      that need proper data filled in.
>
> ___ You have failed to nominate the proper persons for review and push.
>
> ___ Your patches do not have proper short+long header
>
> ___ You have grammar/spelling in your header that is unacceptable.
>
> ___ You have exceeded a sensible line length in your headers/comments/text.
>
> ___ You have failed to put in a proper Trac Ticket # into your commits.
>
> ___ You have incorrectly put/left internal data in your comments/files
>      (i.e. internal bug tracking tool IDs, product names etc)
>
> ___ You have not given any evidence of testing beyond basic build tests.
>      Demonstrate some level of runtime or other sanity testing.
>
> ___ You have ^M present in some of your files. These have to be removed.
>
> ___ You have needlessly changed whitespace or added whitespace crimes
>      like trailing spaces, or spaces before tabs.
>
> ___ You have mixed real technical changes with whitespace and other
>      cosmetic code cleanup changes. These have to be separate commits.
>
> ___ You need to refactor your submission into logical chunks; there is
>      too much content into a single commit.
>
> ___ You have extraneous garbage in your review (merge commits etc)
>
> ___ You have giant attachments which should never have been sent;
>      Instead you should place your content in a public tree to be pulled.
>
> ___ You have too many commits attached to an e-mail; resend as threaded
>      commits, or place in a public tree for a pull.
>
> ___ You have resent this content multiple times without a clear indication
>      of what has changed between each re-send.
>
> ___ You have failed to adequately and individually address all of the
>      comments and change requests that were proposed in the initial review.
>
> ___ You have a misconfigured ~/.hgrc file (i.e. username, email etc)
>
> ___ Your computer have a badly configured date and time; confusing the
>      the threaded patch review.
>
> ___ Your changes affect IPC mechanism, and you don't present any results
>      for in-service upgradability test.
>
> ___ Your changes affect user manual and documentation, your patch series
>      do not contain the patch that updates the Doxygen manual.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> WatchGuard Dimension instantly turns raw network data into actionable
> security intelligence. It gives you real-time visual feedback on key
> security issues and trends.  Skip the complicated setup - simply import
> a virtual appliance and go from zero to informed in seconds.
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=123612991&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
> _______________________________________________
> Opensaf-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensaf-devel
>
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Managing the Performance of Cloud-Based Applications
Take advantage of what the Cloud has to offer - Avoid Common Pitfalls.
Read the Whitepaper.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=121051231&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Opensaf-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensaf-devel

Reply via email to