Hi AndersBj,

Reviewed the patch.
Ack.

/Neel.
On Friday 14 February 2014 03:12 PM, Anders Bjornerstedt wrote:
> Summary: IMM: Adjust log message & severity for intentional PBE termination 
> [#764]
> Review request for Trac Ticket(s): 764
> Peer Reviewer(s): Neel
> Pull request to:
> Affected branch(es): 4.2; 4.3
> Development branch:
>
> --------------------------------
> Impacted area       Impact y/n
> --------------------------------
>   Docs                    n
>   Build system            n
>   RPM/packaging           n
>   Configuration files     n
>   Startup scripts         n
>   SAF services            n
>   OpenSAF services        y
>   Core libraries          n
>   Samples                 n
>   Tests                   n
>   Other                   n
>
>
> Comments (indicate scope for each "y" above):
> ---------------------------------------------
>
> changeset dcdaf601ce95927192d9d722b11bd8a249c6d93d
> Author:       Anders Bjornerstedt <anders.bjornerst...@ericsson.com>
> Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 10:22:02 +0100
>
>       IMM: Adjust log message & severity for intentional PBE termination 
> [#764]
>
> Problem is already fixed in 4.4 and default(4.5).
> The patch thus only applies on 4.2 and 4.3.
>
> Complete diffstat:
> ------------------
>   osaf/services/saf/immsv/immnd/immnd_proc.c |  12 ++++++++++--
>   1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
>
> Testing Commands:
> -----------------
> Disable PBE and check the syslog.
> The termination of the PBE should be logged as NOtice and not WArning.
>
> Enable the PBE.
> Kill the PBE process.
> The unexpected termination of the PBE should be logged as WArning.
>
>
> Testing, Expected Results:
> --------------------------
> See above.
>
> Conditions of Submission:
> -------------------------
> Ack from Neel.
>
> Arch      Built     Started    Linux distro
> -------------------------------------------
> mips        n          n
> mips64      n          n
> x86         n          n
> x86_64      n          n
> powerpc     n          n
> powerpc64   n          n
>
>
> Reviewer Checklist:
> -------------------
> [Submitters: make sure that your review doesn't trigger any checkmarks!]
>
>
> Your checkin has not passed review because (see checked entries):
>
> ___ Your RR template is generally incomplete; it has too many blank entries
>      that need proper data filled in.
>
> ___ You have failed to nominate the proper persons for review and push.
>
> ___ Your patches do not have proper short+long header
>
> ___ You have grammar/spelling in your header that is unacceptable.
>
> ___ You have exceeded a sensible line length in your headers/comments/text.
>
> ___ You have failed to put in a proper Trac Ticket # into your commits.
>
> ___ You have incorrectly put/left internal data in your comments/files
>      (i.e. internal bug tracking tool IDs, product names etc)
>
> ___ You have not given any evidence of testing beyond basic build tests.
>      Demonstrate some level of runtime or other sanity testing.
>
> ___ You have ^M present in some of your files. These have to be removed.
>
> ___ You have needlessly changed whitespace or added whitespace crimes
>      like trailing spaces, or spaces before tabs.
>
> ___ You have mixed real technical changes with whitespace and other
>      cosmetic code cleanup changes. These have to be separate commits.
>
> ___ You need to refactor your submission into logical chunks; there is
>      too much content into a single commit.
>
> ___ You have extraneous garbage in your review (merge commits etc)
>
> ___ You have giant attachments which should never have been sent;
>      Instead you should place your content in a public tree to be pulled.
>
> ___ You have too many commits attached to an e-mail; resend as threaded
>      commits, or place in a public tree for a pull.
>
> ___ You have resent this content multiple times without a clear indication
>      of what has changed between each re-send.
>
> ___ You have failed to adequately and individually address all of the
>      comments and change requests that were proposed in the initial review.
>
> ___ You have a misconfigured ~/.hgrc file (i.e. username, email etc)
>
> ___ Your computer have a badly configured date and time; confusing the
>      the threaded patch review.
>
> ___ Your changes affect IPC mechanism, and you don't present any results
>      for in-service upgradability test.
>
> ___ Your changes affect user manual and documentation, your patch series
>      do not contain the patch that updates the Doxygen manual.
>


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Android apps run on BlackBerry 10
Introducing the new BlackBerry 10.2.1 Runtime for Android apps.
Now with support for Jelly Bean, Bluetooth, Mapview and more.
Get your Android app in front of a whole new audience.  Start now.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=124407151&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Opensaf-devel mailing list
Opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensaf-devel

Reply via email to