Summary: v2 amfd: fix SG reconfig when SUs are added/removed
Review request for Trac Ticket(s): 278
Peer Reviewer(s): Praveen
Pull request to: <<LIST THE PERSON WITH PUSH ACCESS HERE>>
Affected branch(es): all
Development branch: default

--------------------------------
Impacted area       Impact y/n
--------------------------------
 Docs                    n
 Build system            n
 RPM/packaging           n
 Configuration files     n
 Startup scripts         n
 SAF services            y
 OpenSAF services        n
 Core libraries          n
 Samples                 n
 Tests                   n
 Other                   n


Comments (indicate scope for each "y" above):
---------------------------------------------

changeset 0a7c3662dab95c9b588155eae25641ffd4ee6268
Author: Hans Feldt <[email protected]>
Date:   Mon, 10 Mar 2014 17:26:37 +0100

        v2 amfd: fix SG reconfig when SUs are added/removed [#278]

        Problem: When an SG is extended with a new SU, it will not be 
instatiated or
        assigned.

        Reason: SG attributes saAmfSGNumPrefAssignedSUs and
        saAmfSGNumPrefInserviceSUs are not calculated dynamically as SUs are 
added
        (and deleted).

        Change: Add a shadow bool "xxx_configured" member of the SG struct
        (following the same pattern as for SGautorepair). If the value of this
        member is false, the value of the corresponding attribute will be
        calculated.


Complete diffstat:
------------------
 osaf/services/saf/amf/amfd/include/sg.h |   6 +++++-
 osaf/services/saf/amf/amfd/sg.cc        |  80 
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------------
 2 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)


Testing Commands:
-----------------
 Add new SU to existing SG that does not have saAmfSGNumPrefInserviceSUs
configured.


Testing, Expected Results:
--------------------------
 SU gets instantiated


Conditions of Submission:
-------------------------
 Ack from reviewers


Arch      Built     Started    Linux distro
-------------------------------------------
mips        n          n
mips64      n          n
x86         n          n
x86_64      n          n
powerpc     n          n
powerpc64   n          n


Reviewer Checklist:
-------------------
[Submitters: make sure that your review doesn't trigger any checkmarks!]


Your checkin has not passed review because (see checked entries):

___ Your RR template is generally incomplete; it has too many blank entries
    that need proper data filled in.

___ You have failed to nominate the proper persons for review and push.

___ Your patches do not have proper short+long header

___ You have grammar/spelling in your header that is unacceptable.

___ You have exceeded a sensible line length in your headers/comments/text.

___ You have failed to put in a proper Trac Ticket # into your commits.

___ You have incorrectly put/left internal data in your comments/files
    (i.e. internal bug tracking tool IDs, product names etc)

___ You have not given any evidence of testing beyond basic build tests.
    Demonstrate some level of runtime or other sanity testing.

___ You have ^M present in some of your files. These have to be removed.

___ You have needlessly changed whitespace or added whitespace crimes
    like trailing spaces, or spaces before tabs.

___ You have mixed real technical changes with whitespace and other
    cosmetic code cleanup changes. These have to be separate commits.

___ You need to refactor your submission into logical chunks; there is
    too much content into a single commit.

___ You have extraneous garbage in your review (merge commits etc)

___ You have giant attachments which should never have been sent;
    Instead you should place your content in a public tree to be pulled.

___ You have too many commits attached to an e-mail; resend as threaded
    commits, or place in a public tree for a pull.

___ You have resent this content multiple times without a clear indication
    of what has changed between each re-send.

___ You have failed to adequately and individually address all of the
    comments and change requests that were proposed in the initial review.

___ You have a misconfigured ~/.hgrc file (i.e. username, email etc)

___ Your computer have a badly configured date and time; confusing the
    the threaded patch review.

___ Your changes affect IPC mechanism, and you don't present any results
    for in-service upgradability test.

___ Your changes affect user manual and documentation, your patch series
    do not contain the patch that updates the Doxygen manual.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book
"Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and their
applications. Written by three acclaimed leaders in the field,
this first edition is now available. Download your free book today!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/13534_NeoTech
_______________________________________________
Opensaf-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensaf-devel

Reply via email to