Hi zoran,

Reviewed and tested the patch.
Ack.

/Neel.

On Friday 28 March 2014 07:32 PM, Zoran Milinkovic wrote:
> Summary: IMM: release inactive search handles [#47]
> Review request for Trac Ticket(s): 47
> Peer Reviewer(s): Neelakanta
> Pull request to: Zoran
> Affected branch(es): default(4.5)
> Development branch: default(4.5)
>
> --------------------------------
> Impacted area       Impact y/n
> --------------------------------
>   Docs                    n
>   Build system            n
>   RPM/packaging           n
>   Configuration files     n
>   Startup scripts         n
>   SAF services            y
>   OpenSAF services        n
>   Core libraries          n
>   Samples                 n
>   Tests                   n
>   Other                   n
>
>
> Comments (indicate scope for each "y" above):
> ---------------------------------------------
>   <<EXPLAIN/COMMENT THE PATCH SERIES HERE>>
>
> changeset af2fce400e5a0d81127739817a0b87fa8b144b66
> Author:       Zoran Milinkovic <zoran.milinko...@ericsson.com>
> Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 14:28:18 +0100
>
>       IMM: release inactive search handles [#47]
>
>
> Complete diffstat:
> ------------------
>   osaf/services/saf/immsv/immnd/ImmModel.cc    |  49 
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>   osaf/services/saf/immsv/immnd/ImmSearchOp.cc |   1 +
>   osaf/services/saf/immsv/immnd/ImmSearchOp.hh |   4 ++++
>   3 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
>
> Testing Commands:
> -----------------
>
>
> Testing, Expected Results:
> --------------------------
> Initialize a search, wait for more than 10 minutes, and then search for a 
> next search result. The function should return ERR_BAD_HANDLE error code.
> Pause for more than 10 minutes can be done after few search next results.
>
>
> Conditions of Submission:
> -------------------------
> Ack from Neelakanta
>
>
> Arch      Built     Started    Linux distro
> -------------------------------------------
> mips        n          n
> mips64      n          n
> x86         n          n
> x86_64      n          n
> powerpc     n          n
> powerpc64   n          n
>
>
> Reviewer Checklist:
> -------------------
> [Submitters: make sure that your review doesn't trigger any checkmarks!]
>
>
> Your checkin has not passed review because (see checked entries):
>
> ___ Your RR template is generally incomplete; it has too many blank entries
>      that need proper data filled in.
>
> ___ You have failed to nominate the proper persons for review and push.
>
> ___ Your patches do not have proper short+long header
>
> ___ You have grammar/spelling in your header that is unacceptable.
>
> ___ You have exceeded a sensible line length in your headers/comments/text.
>
> ___ You have failed to put in a proper Trac Ticket # into your commits.
>
> ___ You have incorrectly put/left internal data in your comments/files
>      (i.e. internal bug tracking tool IDs, product names etc)
>
> ___ You have not given any evidence of testing beyond basic build tests.
>      Demonstrate some level of runtime or other sanity testing.
>
> ___ You have ^M present in some of your files. These have to be removed.
>
> ___ You have needlessly changed whitespace or added whitespace crimes
>      like trailing spaces, or spaces before tabs.
>
> ___ You have mixed real technical changes with whitespace and other
>      cosmetic code cleanup changes. These have to be separate commits.
>
> ___ You need to refactor your submission into logical chunks; there is
>      too much content into a single commit.
>
> ___ You have extraneous garbage in your review (merge commits etc)
>
> ___ You have giant attachments which should never have been sent;
>      Instead you should place your content in a public tree to be pulled.
>
> ___ You have too many commits attached to an e-mail; resend as threaded
>      commits, or place in a public tree for a pull.
>
> ___ You have resent this content multiple times without a clear indication
>      of what has changed between each re-send.
>
> ___ You have failed to adequately and individually address all of the
>      comments and change requests that were proposed in the initial review.
>
> ___ You have a misconfigured ~/.hgrc file (i.e. username, email etc)
>
> ___ Your computer have a badly configured date and time; confusing the
>      the threaded patch review.
>
> ___ Your changes affect IPC mechanism, and you don't present any results
>      for in-service upgradability test.
>
> ___ Your changes affect user manual and documentation, your patch series
>      do not contain the patch that updates the Doxygen manual.
>


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Put Bad Developers to Shame
Dominate Development with Jenkins Continuous Integration
Continuously Automate Build, Test & Deployment 
Start a new project now. Try Jenkins in the cloud.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/13600_Cloudbees
_______________________________________________
Opensaf-devel mailing list
Opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensaf-devel

Reply via email to